
A Pennsylvania federal judge ordered California to pay nearly $80,000 in legal fees to Par Pharmaceutical Inc for failing to comply with discovery obligations in multidistrict litigation alleging a broad price-fixing conspiracy for generic drugs.
In her court order, US District Judge Cynthia Rufe in Philadelphia called the attorneys’ fee award, sought by Par’s lawyers at Williams & Connolly, an “appropriate discovery sanction” for California’s “continued intransigence” in not abiding by obligations to turn over information. Rufe declined to block California from presenting evidence in the litigation, which Par had sought.
Williams & Connolly associate Brian Gilmore in Washington, DC, a lawyer for Endo International subsidiary Par, had urged the court on Dec. 1 to award about $104,000 in legal fees as a penalty against the California Attorney General’s Office. He said the fee request applied a 10% discount to his standard $850 hourly billing rate.
Fee sanctions against state and federal governments for alleged discovery violations are rare. The court-appointed special master who recommended a sanction said earlier this year “some strong and clear action was needed in order to resolve this dispute.”
California is a member of a multistate coalition in the MDL, which involves allegations that defendant pharmaceutical companies participated in a scheme to fix and maintain prices for certain drugs. Defendant companies have denied wrongdoing.
The US Justice Department separately is conducting an ongoing criminal investigation of price-fixing claims in the generic pharmaceutical industry.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Dollar Tree to Sell Family Dollar for $1 Billion, Ending Struggling Merger
Mar 26, 2025 by
CPI
Meta Platforms Defends Use of Authors’ Works in AI Training in US Court
Mar 26, 2025 by
CPI
EU Pressed Meta to Address Antitrust Concerns Over Facebook Marketplace
Mar 26, 2025 by
CPI
UBS, Nomura, and UniCredit Fail to Overturn EU Antitrust Fines in Bond Trading Cartel Case
Mar 26, 2025 by
CPI
Coca-Cola Among Firms Targeted in EU Antitrust Raids
Mar 26, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mobile Ecosystems
Mar 24, 2025 by
CPI
Mobile Ecosystems: An Intellectual Entelechy but A Necessary Model
Mar 24, 2025 by
Alba Ribera Martinez
Creating Contestability and Fairness in Mobile Ecosystems: The Contribution of the DMA
Mar 24, 2025 by
Damien Geradin & Daniel Mandrescu
Digital Ecosystems and the Not (Yet) As Efficient Competitor Principle
Mar 24, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Assessing the Competition Law Scrutiny of Smart Wearables and Mobile AR/VR Devices
Mar 24, 2025 by
Kayvan Hazemi-Jebelli