
Chicago drivers on Tuesday asked a US appeals court to force the city to open up the operation of its parking meters to competition, as the plaintiffs’ lawyers pressed their claims that an exclusive public-private partnership worth $1.1 billion violates federal antitrust law.
The plaintiffs filed their opening brief in the Chicago-based 7th US Circuit Court of Appeals, arguing that a US federal judge was wrong to conclude Chicago Parking Meters enjoys immunity from antitrust law based on the 75-year deal it reached with the city in 2008.
The drivers are not seeking money damages but want to compel Chicago to consider competitors.
“Chicago has given CPM an unregulated 75-year monopoly depriving the city of its full regulatory authority over the streets and public ways not for three or four years, but rather, for close to a century,” Thomas Geoghegan of Despres, Schwartz & Geoghegan wrote for the plaintiffs. “And it is an exclusive contract that is impossible to cancel unless the city pays billions and billions of dollars to do so.”
Geoghegan on Wednesday declined to comment about the case, filed in 2021 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
Chicago Parking Meters’ lawyers at Winston & Strawn, including Dan Webb, co-executive chairman of the firm, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Last September, they urged U.S. District Judge Matthew Kennelly to dismiss the drivers’ lawsuit. The defense lawyers argued the plaintiffs had not shown they were harmed and that the company was immune from federal antitrust liability.
In dismissing the case, Kennelly in January applied the “state action” legal doctrine that can shield certain local government activities from federal antitrust liability.
The Chicago plaintiffs assert in their appeal that the shield does not extend to a private entity.
Geoghegan’s court filing said there is no “‘clearly articulated’ state policy in favor of turning over the control of city curb space to a private party.”
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
House Budget Bill’s Moratorium on State AI Laws Could Undo A Range of Tech Regs, Critics Say
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Microsoft Nears EU Antitrust Resolution Over Teams Bundling, Sources Say
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
CMA Investigates Aviva’s £3.6B Acquisition of Direct Line Group
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Google Urges Texas Judge to Disregard Virginia Antitrust Ruling
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Anthropic Ordered to Respond After AI Allegedly Fabricates Citation in Legal Filing
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Healthcare Antitrust
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare & Antitrust: What to Expect in the New Trump Administration
May 14, 2025 by
Nana Wilberforce, John W O'Toole & Sarah Pugh
Patent Gaming and Disparagement: Commission Fines Teva For Improperly Protecting Its Blockbuster Medicine
May 14, 2025 by
Blaž Višnar, Boris Andrejaš, Apostolos Baltzopoulos, Rieke Kaup, Laura Nistor & Gianluca Vassallo
Strategic Alliances in the Pharma Sector: An EU Competition Law Perspective
May 14, 2025 by
Christian Ritz & Benedikt Weiss
Monopsony Power in the Hospital Labor Market
May 14, 2025 by
Kevin E. Pflum & Christian Salas