A PYMNTS Company

Competition Buzz: Failure of Spanish Law to Prevent and Correct Bid Rigging in Public Procurement

By  |  May 24, 2016

By: Antonio Lopez Mino & Patricia Valcarcel Fernandez

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Does the Spanish Public Procurement law offer any remedy against bid rigging that authorities can implement within a contracting procedure? To be honest, there are not legal weapons to use in case that signals of collusive practices were put forward by other bidders or found out by the officials, apart from the duty to communicate those evidences to the (regional or national) Competition Authority. This last issue has two dramatic drawbacks. First, it exemplifies Public Procurement law lack of autonomy, needed to ask Antitrust law for assistance to face a vital danger. Second, it assumes that the contracting procedure must end and award the contract before sending the application to the Competition Authority.

    This paper analyzes the Spanish Public Procurement Code (the TRLCSP) to find inside remedies against bid rigging. It also digs into the scarce EUCJ on the subject. As a principal matter of study, the Proposal for a Directive on public procurement (consolidated version) offers a scheme of preventive self-declarations for economic operators and exclusions for bidders incurring in collusion.

    Full Content: SSRN

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.