A PYMNTS Company

ConCourt rules against Commission’s favor in Yara and Loungefoam

By  |  June 27, 2012
ConCourt rules against Commission’s favor in Yara and Loungefoam

The South African Constitutional Court (ConCourt) has denied the Competition Commission’s applications for leave to appeal the Yara and Loungefoam cases. The Commission sought to appeal earlier decisions of the Competition Appeal Court (CAC) that curtail the watchdog’s investigative powers.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    In Yara, the CAC blocked the Commission from adding facts to its complaint referral to the Competition Tribunal that were uncovered during a later investigation. The ConCourt held that the Commission’s delay in making its application was excessive, with insufficient explanations to justify the delay.

    In Loungefoam, ConCourt held that the Commission could not bypass the Supreme Court of Appeal by applying directly for leave to appeal with the ConCourt.

    The Commission’s application to appeal Yara to the Supreme Court of Appeal is still pending.

    Full content: Polity

     

    Related content: Competition Law Develops in Southern Africa

     

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.