Pizza takeaway chain Domino’s has slammed a watchdog’s decision to give the go-ahead to Amazon’s £442 million investment in Deliveroo, claiming the decision will harm competition and consumers.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) provisionally cleared the investment in April over concerns that Deliveroo could collapse without extra financial backing due restaurant closures during the coronavirus crisis.
However, in evidence to the CMA published Thursday, May 14, Domino’s stated the watchdog had taken “a short-term view unduly influenced by Covid-19.”
“The effect of the transaction is to reinforce the dominance of the Amazon ecosystem and opens up the real possibility of this dominance being leveraged into restaurant home delivery to the detriment of consumers,” Domino’s said.
It added, “Just as the Amazon marketplace has become an essential route to market for e-commerce retailers, the same could become true of restaurant and grocery home delivery, with Amazon/Deliveroo controlling the gateway to consumers in the online food delivery sector.”
Pub chain All Our Bars also said the deal could be negative for competition and consumers.
“If they [Deliveroo] have issues with finance, then they should take the routes that the bricks and mortar retailers have had to take and you should not allow Amazon to take dominance in one of the last areas where they do not pervade,” said Paul Wigham, chief executive of the group, which owns pubs across south east England.
Full Content: City AM
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
CVS Health Explores Potential Breakup Amid Investor Pressure: Report
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
DirecTV Acquires Dish TV, Creating 20 Million-Subscriber Powerhouse
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea Fines Kakao Mobility $54.8 Million for Anti-Competitive Practices
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Google Offers Settlement in India’s Antitrust Case Regarding Smart TVs
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Attorney Challenges NCAA’s $2.78 Billion Settlement in Landmark Antitrust Cases
Oct 3, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh