The Supreme Court of El Salvador has notified the Superintendence of Competition (SC) of two decisions in its favor, pertaining to cases appealed by economic agents: Operadora del Sur, S.A. of C.V. and AIG Vida, S.A. People Insurance. So far, the Supreme Court has reviewed a total of 26 resolutions issued against the SC, 23 of which have resulted in positive decisions for the authority, with two more being dropped by the plaintiffs and only one finding against the regulator.
In the case promoted by Operadora del Sur, which sued the SC’s chief economist over their request of information while working on the study “Conditions of Competition and Consumer Protection in the White Corn and Bean Agricultural Sector in El Salvador”. The Supreme Court dismissed Operadora del Sur’s claim, as it was directed against an act ( specifically, the requirement of information within the development of a competition study) that does not meet the requirements for legal recourse.
In the case promoted by AIG, the SCA ruled last September stating that there had been none of the alleged illegalities in relation to the resolution issued in March 2014 by the SC, by means of which the plaintiff was sanctioned for failing to provide requested information, related to an investigation on anticompetitive practices that, subsequently, proved the existence of an anti-competitive agreement executed between the insurer and Asesuisa Vida, SA, People Insurance, and Sisa Vida SA, in public tenders.
Full Content: Superintendencia de Competencia
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Pork Industry Faces Legal Challenges as Antitrust Lawsuits Against Seaboard Foods Dismissed
Oct 2, 2024 by
CPI
CMA Strengthens Investigation with Advisory Panel of Veterinary Experts
Oct 2, 2024 by
CPI
US Merchants Sue Visa, Alleging Unfair Dominance in Debit Card Market
Oct 2, 2024 by
CPI
European Commission Appoints New Chief Competition Economist
Oct 2, 2024 by
CPI
EU Commission Requests Information from YouTube, Snapchat, TikTok on Algorithm Usage
Oct 2, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh