Two board members of Fortnite developer Epic Games have stepped down following concerns raised by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) about potential antitrust violations involving Tencent, a Chinese tech and gaming giant. The DOJ cited Section 8 of the Clayton Act, which prohibits individuals from serving on the boards of competing companies, as the basis for its concerns, according to Hollywood Reporter.
The resignations were announced on Wednesday, with the DOJ’s Antitrust Division confirming that Tencent has also amended its shareholder agreement with Epic Games. Per the revised terms, Tencent will no longer hold unilateral rights to appoint directors or board observers at Epic in the future, according to Hollywood Reporter.
The names of the departing board members have not been disclosed. Epic Games remains privately held, with Tencent serving as a significant investor. Tencent also owns Riot Games, the developer behind popular franchises such as League of Legends.
Read more: Google Seeks Reversal of Antitrust Ruling in Epic Games Case
This development is part of the DOJ’s broader efforts to address interlocking directorates under Section 8 of the Clayton Act. The statute aims to prevent individuals from holding board positions at competing firms, barring limited exceptions. The DOJ has increasingly scrutinized these arrangements, seeing them as a potential threat to competitive practices.
Earlier this year, similar antitrust concerns led to changes at Warner Bros. Discovery, where two Newhouse family members relinquished board seats due to their roles at Charter Communications. John Malone, director emeritus of Charter, also stepped down, citing concerns over compliance with the Clayton Act.
“Scrutiny around interlocking directorates continues to be an enforcement priority for the Antitrust Division,” said Miriam R. Vishio, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement at the DOJ’s Antitrust Division. Vishio added that the department’s focus on Section 8 enforcement has delivered significant outcomes in recent years, reinforcing its importance in maintaining competitive integrity in the marketplace.
Source: Hollywood Reporter.
Featured News
Federal Judge Dismisses Class Action Alleging Inflated Yacht Commission Fees
Jan 22, 2025 by
CPI
Doug Gurr Appointed Interim Chairman of UK’s Competition Authority
Jan 22, 2025 by
CPI
LinkedIn Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Misuse of Customer Data for AI Training
Jan 22, 2025 by
Amanda Adams
Johns Hopkins and Caltech Settle for $35.3M in College Price-Fixing Lawsuit
Jan 22, 2025 by
CPI
Top Antitrust Expert Joins Cravath from Paul Weiss
Jan 21, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Pharmacy Benefit Managers
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
Untangling the PBM Mess
Jan 20, 2025 by
Kent Bernard
Using Data, Not Anecdotes, to Analyze Criticisms of Pharmacy Benefit Managers
Jan 20, 2025 by
Dennis Carlton
Vertical Integration and PBMs: What, Me Worry?
Jan 20, 2025 by
Lawton Robert Burns & Bradley Fluegel
The Economics of Benefit Management in Prescription-Drug Markets
Jan 20, 2025 by
Casey B. Mulligan