The European Commission was allowed to use documents collected by police in a tax investigation to issue a cartel fine, the EU’s top court has ruled.
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has dismissed an appeal by Italian banana importers against the $7.32 million fine for participating in a price-fixing cartel, saying that all that mattered was the credibility of any evidence.
Pacific Fruit group was fined by the Commission in 2011 for participating with Chiquita in a price fixing cartel for fresh bananas in Greece, Italy and Portugal. The investigation was based on documents found by Italy’s financial police, the Guardia di Finanzia, during a tax investigation-related search of a Pacific Fruit employee’s home
The Commission was allowed to use these documents in evidence in proving the cartel, the CJEU said.
“The prevailing principle in EU law is that evidence may be freely adduced and that the only relevant criterion for the purpose of assessing the evidence adduced is its credibility,” the court said.
The CJEU disagreed with Pacific Fruit’s contention that transmission of the documents was covered by EU statutes, saying instead that national law applied.
The Court also rejected Pacific Fruit’s attempts to show that the cartel served a pro-competitive purpose.
Full Content: Mondaq
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
UK to Boost Broadband Competition While Capping Openreach Charges, Says Ofcom
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
Singapore Competition Watchdog Yet to Receive Formal Notification on Grab-GoTo Merger
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
Crypto Exchange Kraken Buys NinjaTrader for $1.5 Billion
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
Airbnb Caught in Contradiction Over EU’s Digital Markets Act
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
Atkore Faces Shareholder Lawsuit Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Mar 19, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li