The CJEU, Europe’s highest court, rejected a complaint from Pilkington about the sales figures and exchange rate used to calculate the fine.
The European Commission imposed the fine on Pilkington in 2008, when it found the company guilty of price fixing in the market for car glass between 1998 and 2002.
The fine calculation included contracts that were negotiated before the cartel was in place, Pilkington said. The glassmaker also said that the exchange rate used to convert its sterling-based sales figures into euros had cost it an extra €40 million.
CJEU advocate general Juliane Kolkott said that the whole turnover achieved should be used to calculate a fine when the object of a cartel is to distort competition. To use only some sales figures would “artificially reduce the economic effect of the cartel” and would also involve a disproportionate effort by the court, she said.
On the exchange rate, Pilkington argued that the Commission should have used the European Central Bank exchange rate on the day it made the decision rather than an average for the previous year. Kolkott said that this would have been “comparing apples and pears”, applying a new exchange rate to old figures. The average rate “reflects the economic realities” over the course of the year, she said.
A further appeal concerning the automotive glass cartel is currently pending before the CJEU. However, it does not challenge the same judgment of the General Court and raises entirely different legal issues, the CJEU said.
Full Content: Out-Law
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Orders Apple to Address Fortnite App Block or Face Court Hearing
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
EU Civil Society Groups and Labor Unions Raise Alarm Over Proposed Changes to GDPR
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
EU Antitrust Regulators Push Back Deadline on UniCredit’s Takeover Bid for Banco BPM
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
Intel Challenges €376 Million EU Fine in Ongoing Antitrust Dispute
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
Red Bull Challenges EU Commission Over Lengthy Antitrust Inspection
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Healthcare Antitrust
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare & Antitrust: What to Expect in the New Trump Administration
May 14, 2025 by
Nana Wilberforce, John W O'Toole & Sarah Pugh
Patent Gaming and Disparagement: Commission Fines Teva For Improperly Protecting Its Blockbuster Medicine
May 14, 2025 by
Blaž Višnar, Boris Andrejaš, Apostolos Baltzopoulos, Rieke Kaup, Laura Nistor & Gianluca Vassallo
Strategic Alliances in the Pharma Sector: An EU Competition Law Perspective
May 14, 2025 by
Christian Ritz & Benedikt Weiss
Monopsony Power in the Hospital Labor Market
May 14, 2025 by
Kevin E. Pflum & Christian Salas