Neelie Kroes, the former commissioner for both the Commission’s competition and digital policy departments, on Thursday penned a Guardian op-ed in which she criticized the decision to go after Apple’s tax arrangements on state aid grounds.
Current competition commissioner Margrethe Vestager this week said Ireland had broken state aid rules by accepting Apple’s tax scheme and effectively letting the company—a major employer in Ireland—get away with paying as little as 0.005% in corporation tax.
She suggested that Vestager’s decision represented a “radical new approach to so-called transfer-pricing rules that determine where profits shall be allocated,” thus undermining the ability for EU member states to write their own tax laws.
Vestager has already said that transfer pricing, where subsidiaries pay one another for intellectual property, was not a factor in the Apple-Ireland case, although her department has still not published the full nonconfidential version of her decision.
“You cannot change the rules of the game through ad hoc state aid enforcement, and then seek retroactive recovery for unpaid taxes,” Kroes wrote.
On Friday the Commission’s chief spokesperson, Margaritis Schinas, responded to a question about Kroes’s piece in the Commission’s midday briefing.
It was a polite reply in phrasing but not content, as Schinas drew attention to the fact that Kroes is these days a public policy board member of another big U.S. tech firm, Uber, which also uses elaborate tax planning schemes. She is essentially a lobbyist now.
“We understand that it may be sometimes challenging to reconcile the role as a former commissioner with the temptation to publicly express the views of those in Silicon Valley or elsewhere who oppose the Commission’s decisions,” Schinas said.
Full Content: Fortune
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
9th Circuit Revives Privacy Lawsuit Against Shopify Over Data Tracking
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
DOJ Warns Google Could Use AI Tools to Extend Search Monopoly As Antitrust Remedies Trial Begins
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Uber Faces Regulatory Heat as FTC Targets Subscription Practices
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Supreme Court Declines to Hear CSX Antitrust Case Against Norfolk Southern
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Proposed Antitrust Law Could Cost NY Billions, Says Business Council
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickinson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece