
More than 20 price comparison websites across Europe have raised concerns about Google’s proposed changes to its search results, claiming the revisions fail to meet the requirements of the European Union’s Digital Markets Act (DMA). The websites urged regulators to take decisive action against Google, a unit of Alphabet, citing ongoing non-compliance with EU rules, according to Reuters.
The DMA, introduced to prevent tech giants from prioritizing their own products and services on digital platforms, has been a focal point of discussions between Google and various stakeholders, including comparison sites, hotels, airlines, and retailers. For over a year, Google has been in talks to align its practices with the legislation. Last month, the company announced new measures, such as expanding and standardizing units that give users options between comparison sites and supplier websites.
One of the alternatives Google is exploring is a return to its “ten blue links” format, a layout popular in its early days. This simpler approach to search results is currently being tested in Germany, Belgium, and Estonia.
However, the coalition of price comparison websites—including Germany’s Idealo and billiger.de, France’s Le Guide, and others such as PriceRunner, Kelkoo, kieskeurig.nl, and trovaprezzi.it—has expressed frustration over Google’s handling of their feedback. In an open letter, the group accused Google of disregarding their input, stating, “Google has simply, repeatedly, ignored this feedback, and instead continued to iterate on the same non-compliant solution for months.”
Read more: Japan Adopts Ordinance to Regulate Tech Giants Apple and Google
The letter further claimed that Google’s actions demonstrate a deliberate avoidance of compliance. “If Google has not taken feedback into account after more than 100 events, it can only mean one thing: Google is wilfully not complying with the DMA,” they alleged.
When asked to comment, Google directed attention to a blog post published on November 26, which outlines the company’s efforts over the past year to align its practices with DMA regulations.
The group of websites has called on the European Commission to escalate its proceedings against Google. They emphasized the need for urgent regulatory action, urging the imposition of fines and periodic penalty payments to compel compliance. “The Commission has opened proceedings against Google for non-compliance. It must proceed with such proceedings, issue preliminary findings, and impose fines on Google, including periodic penalty payments, to force Google to finally listen and comply,” they stated.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
CFPB Allows Some Operations to Resume Amid Legal Challenge
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
NASCAR Accuses Michael Jordan’s Race Team of Illegal Cartel in Legal Battle
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare Providers Sue BCBS Insurers Over Alleged Collusion
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Indian Distributors File Antitrust Case Against Quick-Delivery Giants
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
EU Lawmakers Send Letter Rejecting Claims of Bias in Digital Rules
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li