A PYMNTS Company

Federal Judge Blocks FTC Rule Banning Noncompete Agreements

By  |  August 20, 2024
FTC

A federal judge in Texas has issued a ruling that prevents a new rule by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) from taking effect. The rule, which was set to ban noncompete agreements commonly signed by employees, was scheduled to be implemented on September 4. The decision, handed down by U.S. District Judge Ada Brown, calls into question the FTC’s authority to enforce such broad restrictions on business practices.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    Subscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Judge’s Rationale and Temporary Block

    According to CNBC, Judge Brown, who presides in Dallas, stated that the FTC does not have the power to ban practices it deems as “unfair methods of competition” by enacting sweeping rules. The judge had previously issued a temporary block on the rule in July while considering a challenge brought by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and tax services firm Ryan, which sought to have the rule struck down entirely.

    In her ruling, Brown emphasized that even if the FTC possessed the authority to implement the rule, the agency had not provided sufficient justification for banning nearly all noncompete agreements. She criticized the Commission for its lack of evidence supporting such a broad prohibition, labeling the rule as “arbitrary and capricious.”

    We’d love to be your preferred source for news.

    Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!

    Add as Preferred Source

    “The Commission’s lack of evidence as to why they chose to impose such a sweeping prohibition … instead of targeting specific, harmful non-competes, renders the Rule arbitrary and capricious,” Brown wrote in her decision. Notably, Brown was appointed by former President Donald Trump, a Republican.

    FTC’s Ban and its Implications

    The Democratic-controlled FTC had approved the ban on noncompete agreements in a closely contested 3-2 vote in May. Proponents of the rule argue that noncompetes are an unfair restraint on competition, violating U.S. antitrust law by suppressing workers’ wages and mobility. The FTC estimated that approximately 30 million people, or 20% of the U.S. workforce, are bound by such agreements.

    However, business groups have strongly opposed the FTC’s move. According to CNBC, these groups argue that Congress never intended to grant the FTC such broad regulatory powers. They also contend that banning noncompetes would make it more challenging to protect trade secrets and other sensitive business information.

    Conflicting Judicial Opinions

    The decision from Judge Brown adds to a growing list of conflicting judicial opinions on the issue. Just last week, a federal judge in Florida ruled that the FTC’s ban was likely invalid, blocking its application to a real estate developer. In contrast, a judge in Philadelphia ruled in July that the FTC had reasonably concluded that noncompete agreements are almost never justified.

    The FTC and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have yet to respond to the ruling. The legal battle over the rule is expected to continue, with significant implications for both workers and businesses across the United States.

    Source: CNBC