
Kris Jenkins, the former Villanova basketball star immortalized by his game-winning three-pointer in the 2016 NCAA championship, has filed a federal lawsuit against the NCAA, claiming the organization unlawfully restricted the compensation he was entitled to for the use of his name, image, and likeness (NIL).
Filed April 5 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the suit accuses the NCAA and several major athletic conferences — including the Big East and Big Ten — of participating in a coordinated effort to suppress NIL earnings for Division I athletes, according to Bloomberg.
Jenkins’ legal action emerges just as the NCAA and plaintiffs in related antitrust litigation are seeking final approval of a landmark $2.8 billion settlement. That agreement aims to resolve a trio of antitrust cases brought by current and former athletes, but Jenkins is among those who opted out in favor of individual litigation. Per Bloomberg, he is part of a growing contingent challenging the NCAA’s historical control over student-athlete compensation.
The lawsuit highlights how Jenkins’ buzzer-beater in the 2016 national championship against North Carolina remains one of the most iconic moments in college basketball history. It notes the continued monetization of the play through official NCAA channels, such as its March Madness YouTube page and website, yet claims Jenkins himself has never been compensated for its commercial use.
Related: NCAA to End Controversial NIL Ban After Antitrust Lawsuit Settlement
According to the complaint, Jenkins was also required to attend numerous autograph signings for fans, donors, and collectors without being allowed to profit from his own signature — an arrangement the lawsuit characterizes as exploitative. “Anyone who wanted to earn money on Mr. Jenkins’ autograph could do so; except for Mr. Jenkins himself,” the filing states.
Jenkins is seeking an unspecified amount in damages and a court declaration that would prevent the NCAA from enforcing any rules that limit NIL-related compensation from schools, conferences, or third-party entities.
The NCAA has not yet responded to requests for comment.
The case, titled Jenkins v. NCAA, comes as the men’s basketball national title game between Florida and Houston is set to take place, a reminder of the massive viewership and revenue college sports continue to generate. Jenkins is represented by attorney Kevin Thomas Duffy Jr. of Greenwich, Connecticut.
Source: Bloomberg
Featured News
EU Regulators Probe SES-Intelsat Deal, Seek Insight on Starlink’s Competitive Threat
May 12, 2025 by
CPI
Trump Removes Copyright and Library of Congress Leaders After AI Policy Rift
May 12, 2025 by
CPI
Delta, Korean Air Buy Into WestJet in Major Cross-Border Deal
May 12, 2025 by
CPI
Trump Targets Big Pharma With Tough New Drug Pricing Rules
May 12, 2025 by
CPI
Geradin Partners Expands London Team with New Partner Hire
May 12, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece