FTC settlement good for consumers, clarifies regulations, says antitrust lawyer
Antitrust attorney David Balto argues in the wake of the unanimous decision by the Federal Trade Commission to end its antitrust case against Google that, while controversial, the end result is “certainly good for consumers.” What’s more, Balto argues that the longstanding investigation into Google – and its outcome announced Thursday – shows the strength of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission in its negotiating tactics, which he says ultimately clarified FRAND commitment enforcement by regulators. The result is, according to Balto, “a great first step to eliminate the opacity, posturing and gamesmanship present in high-tech patent litigation.”
Featured News
Democrats Question Big Tech Ballroom Donations Amid Antitrust Concerns
Dec 4, 2025 by
CPI
US Solicitor General Urges Supreme Court to Turn Away Duke Energy Antitrust Case
Dec 4, 2025 by
CPI
Russia Blocks Snapchat and FaceTime in Expanding Crackdown
Dec 4, 2025 by
CPI
Front Row Motorsports Owner Details Major Financial Losses in NASCAR Antitrust Trial
Dec 4, 2025 by
CPI
OpenAI Ordered to Turn Over Millions of ChatGPT Records in Ongoing Copyright Battle
Dec 4, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Intellectual Property
Nov 19, 2025 by
CPI
Dealing in Intellectual Property: IP Justifications and Defenses in Digital Markets Cases
Nov 19, 2025 by
Jennifer Dixton
The Evolving Role of Innovation Theories of Harm in the Antitrust Analysis of Life Science Mergers
Nov 19, 2025 by
Michelle Yost Hale, Matthew D. McDonald & Merrill Stovroff
Who Can Fix It? Antitrust, IP Rights, and the Right to Repair
Nov 19, 2025 by
Rosa M. Morales
Copyright, Antitrust, and the Politics of Generative AI
Nov 19, 2025 by
Daryl Lim