US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Chair Lina Khan applauded the fact that companies are increasingly considering antitrust issues earlier in their decision-making processes. Speaking at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York on Friday, Khan remarked that the growing scrutiny around mergers is helping deter potentially illegal deals.
According to Reuters, Khan emphasized that increased vigilance over mergers translates into a greater deterrence of unlawful corporate actions. “When you see greater scrutiny of mergers, you can see greater deterrence of illegal mergers,” she said. Khan’s comments were in response to a question regarding the criticism she often faces from some Wall Street investors.
Khan noted that for businesses, thinking about the legal implications of their mergers is a step in the right direction. “As a law enforcer, I want people to be thinking about whether their deal is going to violate the law or not going to violate the law, so that’s progress,” she said. Khan also acknowledged that some may view these developments negatively, especially those focused on financial gains from transactions. “If you’re looking at it from the prism of deal fees and that sort of thing, I can see why it might be upsetting,” she added, prompting laughter from the audience.
The FTC chair has faced pushback from some in the business world, who argue that the heightened focus on antitrust issues from the FTC and the Department of Justice (DOJ) has led to a slowdown in mergers and acquisitions. Per Reuters, some critics claim this scrutiny has made the “merger pipeline” dry up. In July, two prominent Democratic donors even urged Vice President Kamala Harris to replace Khan if Harris were to win the presidency.
Despite these criticisms, Khan highlighted the importance of further empirical research to better understand the impact of antitrust enforcement on areas like venture capital.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Dismisses Antitrust Lawsuit Against Ivy League Over Athletic Scholarships
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
FTC and DOJ Revamp Merger Guidelines to Identify Illegal Transactions More Efficiently
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
US Consumer Watchdog Eyes Expansion of ‘Junk Fee’ Crackdown Ahead of 2024 Election
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil Proposes Reform to Competition Law Targeting Big Tech
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Meta Enhances User Data Control, Resolving German Antitrust Dispute
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh