Google’s Payments to Apple Not Monopolistic, Expert Testifies in Antitrust Trial
In the ongoing blockbuster antitrust trial against Alphabet’s Google, an expert witness called by the tech giant defended the multi-billion dollar payments made to Apple, wireless carriers, and other partners, stating that such transactions are normal competitive behavior and not indicative of monopolistic practices, per Reuters.
Kevin Murphy, a professor at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, took the stand on Monday to argue that the substantial payments Google makes, including $26.3 billion in 2021, are a result of healthy competition. He asserted that companies like Apple strategically leverage Google and Microsoft against each other, aiming to secure substantial payments. The government, which has filed major antitrust lawsuits against several Big Tech companies since 2020, claims that Google’s payments are an abuse of its monopoly.
Related: EU to Investigate Apple and Google’s Compliance with New Tech Rules
“The payments that Google makes reflect that competition,” Murphy stated during his testimony. He further contended that these payments to device manufacturers and other partners often benefit end-users, leading to more affordable phones or enhanced data plans, reported Reuters.
Murphy pointed out that even when Microsoft dominated the preinstalled browser defaults in the early 2010s, its Bing search engine only accounted for 15% of search queries. This suggests, according to Murphy, that having default settings does not guarantee dominance in user preferences.
Addressing concerns about the complexity of changing default settings on devices, Murphy acknowledged “some truth” to the argument but emphasized that users often find alternative solutions by switching to different browsers or employing workarounds.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI