Posted by Social Science Research Network
Hundred Years Rule of Reason versus Rule of Law
Adriaan Ten Kate Sr.
Abstract: This is one out of a bundle of essays on the economics of antitrust. It argues that the traditional rule-of-reason approach to the assessment of business conduct erodes the predictability of law enforcement and, as a consequence, the legal certainty of the business community. As the pro- and anti-competitive effects of conduct can hardly be estimated with any degree of precision, business people do not know any more whether or not what they do is legitimate. This is a drawback of competition policy that should not be swept away under the carpet as easily as is often done. The rule of reason of antitrust is an enemy of the rule of law of modern society.
Featured News
Kirkland & Ellis Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner from FTC
Oct 8, 2024 by
CPI
TikTok Hit with Lawsuits from 13 US States and DC
Oct 8, 2024 by
CPI
Merck Wins Antitrust Immunity in Mumps Vaccine Case, U.S. Court Rules
Oct 8, 2024 by
CPI
UK Government Launches New Agency to Fast-Track Tech Regulation
Oct 8, 2024 by
CPI
McDonald’s Sues Beef Giants, Accusing Them of Price-Fixing Conspiracy
Oct 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh