ICM and ICANN have filed motions to dismiss in the ongoing lawsuit between the .XXX domain and YouPorn owners Manwin.
Jones Day attorneys for co-defendant ICANN makes its §12(b)(6) motion on the grounds that ICANN, as a “non-profit public benefit corporation,” cannot incur antitrust liability because it is not engaged in “trade or commerce.” Moreover, the motion continues, no relevant product market is alleged in the complaint for ICANN to even participate in, if it could.
In a memo supporting ICM’s motion to dismiss, Wilmer Hale attorneys charge that Manwin can only allege hypothetical harm to its own businesses, instead of actual harm to competition or consumer welfare, as required under the pleading standard for antitrust violations.
To download ICANN’s motion to dismiss, click here.
To download ICM’s motion to dismiss, click here.
Related content: Ashcroft v. Iqbal: Taking Twombly a Step Further (Caroline Mitchell & David Wallach, Jones Day)
Featured News
Redfin Settles $9.2M Commission Inflation Lawsuits
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Supports Colorado’s Efforts to Block Kroger-Albertsons Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Japan Considers Regulation of AI Developers
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
European Commission Extends Decision Deadline for Ita-Lufthansa Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
UK, US and Australia Sanction Senior Leader of LockBit Cybercrime Gang
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI