A PYMNTS Company

Indian Court Ruling Against Google Over Trademark Keywords Sparks Debate in Advertising Industry

By  |  May 31, 2026
Google AI pointer

A recent ruling by an Indian court against Google has triggered widespread discussion among businesses and legal experts, with many saying the decision could significantly affect the country’s digital advertising landscape.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    The Delhi High Court ruled on May 22 that Google had infringed the trademark rights of Indian bathroom fittings manufacturer Hindware by permitting competing companies to use the brand’s name as an advertising keyword, according to Reuters. The court ordered Google to pay damages of approximately $31,600.

    According to Reuters, the court found that Google’s advertising practices enabled competitors of Hindware to target consumers searching for the company’s products by purchasing the “Hindware” trademark as a keyword. In its judgment, the court stated that “the manner in which Google operates its AdWords Policy makes it clear that Google sells or auctions the use of the trademark … without any authorisation from the proprietor of the trademark.”

    Google responded to the ruling by saying it complies with applicable laws in the countries where it operates. The company said in a statement that it functions in accordance “with all local laws, and in instances where the orders are overbroad or inconsistent with our policies, we work to explain our position as per the legal process,” per Reuters.

    The decision has drawn strong reactions from business leaders and brand owners across India, many of whom argue that trademark owners have long faced challenges from competitors bidding on their brand names in online advertising.

    Read more: Apple, Google Seek Changes to Canada’s Online Safety Bill Over Encryption Concerns

    Nithin Kamath, founder of brokerage firm Zerodha, said the judgment could provide companies with a legal pathway to challenge such practices. According to Reuters, Kamath noted that his own brand had faced similar issues for years and that the ruling “now opens up a route for legal recourse.”

    Entrepreneur Anupam Mittal, founder of matchmaking platform Shaadi.com, also welcomed the verdict. “You create the brand. Someone else bids on it. Google takes the fee,” Mittal said, according to Reuters. He added that the ruling “could change the economics of online advertising for millions of businesses.”

    The case is being closely watched because of Google’s significant presence in India, one of its largest and most important markets. Legal observers and industry participants say the judgment could influence how trademarked terms are handled in online advertising campaigns and may encourage other companies to pursue similar claims in the future.

    Businesses and trademark owners have increasingly argued that allowing competitors to purchase branded keywords can blur distinctions between companies and potentially divert customers. The Delhi High Court’s decision is expected to add momentum to that debate as stakeholders assess its broader implications for India’s digital advertising sector.

    Source: Reuters