
Jazz Pharmaceuticals has agreed to a $145 million settlement to address longstanding antitrust allegations related to its blockbuster narcolepsy treatment, Xyrem.
The pharmaceutical company reached a deal this week with a group of indirect purchasers who accused Jazz of engaging in an anti-competitive “pay-for-delay” scheme, Fierce Pharma reported. The plaintiffs alleged that Jazz had struck arrangements designed to delay the market entry of lower-cost generic versions of Xyrem, keeping prices high for consumers and insurers.
The lawsuit, which was consolidated into a multidistrict litigation (MDL) case in a North Carolina federal court back in 2020, centers around Jazz’s patent settlements with several generic drugmakers. Among them is Hikma Pharmaceuticals, which was granted the rights to release an authorized generic version of Xyrem in early 2023, following a 2017 agreement with Jazz.
Under that deal, Hikma was allowed to distribute its version of Xyrem through Jazz’s restricted distribution system—initially developed to control the drug’s use due to its potential risks—while paying Jazz a royalty on sales. Plaintiffs in the antitrust suit claimed this arrangement effectively stifled real generic competition and enabled Jazz to maintain elevated pricing, per Fierce Pharma.
Related: Jazz Pharmaceuticals Reaches $145 Million Settlement Over Alleged Efforts to Block Generic Xyrem
Jazz, for its part, has denied any wrongdoing. In a recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the company emphasized that it “remains confident” in its legal position and continues to believe that its patent agreements were “pro-competitive.” Nevertheless, Jazz said resolving the matter ahead of trial was “in its best interests.” The lump-sum payment will be funded through existing cash reserves and remains subject to court approval.
The settlement is expected to resolve most of the claims in the MDL, Fierce Pharma noted. Other players involved in the case have already exited; generic manufacturers Amneal and Lupin reached a separate settlement earlier, contributing $3.4 million to a fund supporting ongoing litigation against Jazz and Hikma.
Source: Fierce Pharma
Featured News
Meta Begins Defense After FTC Concludes Case in Landmark Antitrust Trial
May 15, 2025 by
CPI
UK Data Bill Still No Closer to Passage As Parliamentary ‘Ping-Pong’ Drags On
May 15, 2025 by
CPI
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Awarded $271.2M in Damages Against Amgen
May 15, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Chair Proposes 15% Staff Reduction Amid Budget Constraints
May 15, 2025 by
CPI
UK Urges Antitrust Watchdog to Prioritize Growth and Clarity in Business Regulation
May 15, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Healthcare Antitrust
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare & Antitrust: What to Expect in the New Trump Administration
May 14, 2025 by
Nana Wilberforce, John W O'Toole & Sarah Pugh
Patent Gaming and Disparagement: Commission Fines Teva For Improperly Protecting Its Blockbuster Medicine
May 14, 2025 by
Blaž Višnar, Boris Andrejaš, Apostolos Baltzopoulos, Rieke Kaup, Laura Nistor & Gianluca Vassallo
Strategic Alliances in the Pharma Sector: An EU Competition Law Perspective
May 14, 2025 by
Christian Ritz & Benedikt Weiss
Monopsony Power in the Hospital Labor Market
May 14, 2025 by
Kevin E. Pflum & Christian Salas