The U.S. Department of Justice has taken a significant step towards increasing the mobility of college athletes. On Thursday, a proposed consent decree was filed in a West Virginia federal court aiming to prohibit the NCAA from enforcing its controversial rule that requires student-athletes who have transferred once to sit out a year if they transfer again.
The decree, which is awaiting approval by U.S. District Judge John Preston Bailey of the Northern District of West Virginia, also mandates that the NCAA grant an additional year of eligibility to certain athletes who were previously ineligible due to the transfer rule. This provision is designed to compensate those affected by the rule for a season or any portion of a season they were unable to participate in.
“Free from anticompetitive rules that unfairly limit their mobility, Division I college athletes will now be able to choose the institutions that best meet their academic, personal, and professional development needs,” said Jonathan Kanter, Assistant Attorney General of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division. “This resolution is a testament to the benefits of federal and state enforcers working together to ensure free markets and fair competition for all Americans.”
Read more: NCAA and SEC Approve Historic $2.8 Billion Settlement in Antitrust Cases
Judge Bailey had earlier granted a preliminary injunction in the case, which prevented the NCAA from enforcing the transfer rule during the spring sports season. The formal agreement, once approved, will solidify this change and mark a notable shift in how the NCAA regulates student-athlete transfers.
Virginia, one of the ten states that joined the Justice Department in the lawsuit, has been a vocal critic of the NCAA’s policies. Attorney General Jason Miyares, who has actively challenged the NCAA’s regulations in recent years, praised the proposed decree as a victory for student-athletes.
“The NCAA’s inconsistent and arbitrary enforcement of its transfer eligibility rule served as an illegal restraint on student-athletes’ ability to market their talent and control their education,” Miyares stated. “I’m pleased that we could reach an agreement with the NCAA over its transfer eligibility rule. This agreement not only enhances the rights of student-athletes but also provides new opportunities for them to reach their full potential – both on and off the court.”
Source: Justice Gov
Featured News
Clifford Chance Expands Global Antitrust Team with New Partner
Dec 6, 2024 by
CPI
Spain’s Financial Regulator Awaits Antitrust Decision on BBVA’s Hostile Bid for Sabadell
Dec 5, 2024 by
CPI
RealPage Seeks Dismissal of DOJ Antitrust Suit, Citing Legal Flaws
Dec 5, 2024 by
CPI
EU Competition Chief Signals Potential Google Breakup Amid Big Tech Scrutiny
Dec 5, 2024 by
CPI
Turkey Closes Antitrust Probe into Meta’s Threads-Instagram Practices
Dec 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Moats & Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Assessing the Potential for Antitrust Moats and Trenches in the Generative AI Industry
Nov 29, 2024 by
Allison Holt, Sushrut Jain & Ashley Zhou
How SEP Hold-up Can Lead to Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
Jay Jurata, Elena Kamenir & Christie Boyden
The Role of Moats in Unlocking Economic Growth
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Overcoming Moats and Entrenchment: Disruptive Innovation in Generative AI May Be More Successful than Regulation
Nov 29, 2024 by
Simon Chisholm & Charlie Whitehead