Italy is conducting an initial assessment of Facebook parent Meta in a tax case that could result in a bill of approximately 870 million euros ($925 million). This case is significant for the tech sector and is expected to be concluded by the end of the year.
The case could have significant implications for the industry as it focuses on how Meta grants access to services like Facebook and Instagram, according to Reuters.
The case originated from an Italian audit that stated Meta user registrations could be considered a taxable transaction because they involved the exchange of a membership account for the user’s personal data.
Read more: Meta Platforms Set to Launch Threads, To Rival Twitter
The audit conducted by Italy’s Guardia di Finanza (GdF) police, passed on by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), led to the opening of a criminal investigation by Milan magistrates earlier this year.
This has initiated a dialogue between Meta and the Italian tax agency, known as the assessment phase, which will conclude this year either with the company agreeing to pay or with the initiation of tax litigation.
The assessment includes high-ranking Italian tax officials due to the sensitive nature of the issue. Its outcome will influence the direction of the criminal investigation.
Meta acknowledged its commitment to fulfilling its tax obligations, ensuring payment of all required taxes in the countries it operates, and expressing willingness to cooperate fully with the Italian authorities.
“We strongly disagree with the idea that providing access to online platforms to users should be charged with VAT,” a Meta spokesperson said in an emailed statement to Reuters.
Featured News
Veteran Lawyers Launch Boutique Antitrust Firm in NY and DC
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU’s Top Court Upholds Antitrust Veto on Thyssenkrupp-Tata Steel Deal
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil’s Court Delays X’s Return Over Fine Payment Dispute
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Tencent and Guillemot Family Consider Potential Buyout of Ubisoft
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Second Price-Fixing Case Against Hotel-Casinos Dismissed by Federal Judge
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh