
Next week, Mexico’s Congress is poised to vote on a constitutional reform that could significantly alter the landscape of the nation’s regulatory framework in the energy and telecom sectors. The proposal, expected to be approved between November 11 and November 14, seeks to eliminate the independence of key regulatory bodies, including the Hydrocarbons Regulator (CNH) and the Electricity Regulatory Commission (CRE), and integrate them into the Ministry of Energy (Sener).
According to BNA, Ricardo Monreal Ávila, a prominent member of the ruling Morena party and political coordinator in the lower house, confirmed that the reform is on track for approval. Morena, which holds a dominant majority in Congress, has passed several sweeping constitutional amendments over the past month, setting the stage for this latest measure.
The reform’s broad scope extends beyond energy regulators. Along with CNH and CRE, other agencies losing their autonomy would include the Federal Competition Commission (Cofece) and the Federal Telecommunications Institute (IFT). These shifts are part of the administration’s efforts to centralize regulatory control, but they have sparked significant concern among business groups.
Related: Mexico’s First-Ever Class Action Targets Pharma Giants for Price Fixing
Industry representatives argue that removing the independence of these regulators could undermine fair competition in vital sectors. The employers’ association Coparmex has voiced strong opposition to the reform, stressing that the loss of these regulatory bodies would “seriously compromise democratic stability and the balance of powers.” The group also highlighted the critical role these agencies play in ensuring market fairness and protecting consumer interests.
“Their work is essential to guarantee fair economic competition and protect consumer welfare,” Coparmex stated following the constitutional committee’s approval of the proposal.
There are also fears that the reform may strain Mexico’s obligations under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), particularly regarding commitments related to competitive market practices. Critics worry that the centralization of power could create a less predictable environment for private businesses, complicating cross-border trade and investment.
Source: BNA
Featured News
Federal Appeals Court Temporarily Halts Ruling in Consumer Bureau Battle
Apr 3, 2025 by
CPI
Capital One-Discover $35 Billion Merger Moves Forward After DOJ Decision
Apr 3, 2025 by
CPI
RealPage Sues Berkeley Over Ban on Rental Pricing Software
Apr 3, 2025 by
CPI
Olivia Trusty’s FCC Nomination Set for Senate Hearing Next Week
Apr 3, 2025 by
CPI
Amazon Challenges France’s Book Delivery Fee at EU Court
Apr 3, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – China Edition: Year of the Snake
Apr 3, 2025 by
CPI
The Fair Competition Review and the Unified National Market in China
Apr 3, 2025 by
Sen La & Wei Han
Facing the Conundrums: China’s Antitrust Policy Amid Geopolitical Shifts
Apr 3, 2025 by
Da Shi
Concentrations in China in 2023 and 2024
Apr 3, 2025 by
John Yong Ren, Karen Mei & Martha Shu Wen
SAMR’s Evolving Role on the Geopolitical Chessboard
Apr 3, 2025 by
Andrew Foster, Danette Chan & Flora Xiao