According to a source with direct knowledge of the matter, Elon Musk’s social media platform, X, has formally requested Brazil’s Supreme Court to allow it to resume operations in the country. The platform was suspended in late August after failing to comply with court orders related to hate speech moderation and neglecting to appoint a local legal representative, as required by Brazilian law, per Reuters.
Brazil, one of X’s largest and most lucrative markets, saw the platform come under fire for its handling of online content. Despite Musk’s initial refusal to comply, denouncing the court orders as censorship, X has recently reversed its stance. Last week, X’s legal representatives in Brazil informed authorities that the company had appointed a local legal representative and would adhere to court rulings.
Related: Brazil’s Supreme Court Orders X Not to Evade Platform Ban, Warns of Daily Fine
According to Reuters, X has since submitted a document to the Supreme Court proving that lawyer Rachel de Oliveira Conceição has been appointed as its legal representative in Brazil. Additionally, the company has blocked nine accounts currently under investigation for spreading hate speech and misinformation.
The source also revealed that X paid a previously imposed fine of 18 million reais ($3.31 million), another step in its attempt to restore service in Brazil. The platform’s shutdown marked a significant disruption in one of its key markets, highlighting the growing challenges social media companies face in balancing free speech and content moderation.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Veteran Lawyers Launch Boutique Antitrust Firm in NY and DC
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU’s Top Court Upholds Antitrust Veto on Thyssenkrupp-Tata Steel Deal
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil’s Court Delays X’s Return Over Fine Payment Dispute
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Tencent and Guillemot Family Consider Potential Buyout of Ubisoft
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Second Price-Fixing Case Against Hotel-Casinos Dismissed by Federal Judge
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh