
U.S. semiconductor giant Nvidia will need European Union (EU) antitrust approval for its proposed acquisition of Israeli artificial intelligence (AI) startup Run, the European Commission announced on Thursday. This regulatory intervention, per Reuters, comes amid escalating antitrust examinations by both EU and U.S. agencies over high-stakes tech deals. With the chip industry’s growing influence on AI, regulators are increasingly concerned about potential monopolistic tendencies.
The Commission has expressed concerns that Nvidia’s acquisition of Run, which specializes in optimizing AI infrastructure, may stifle competition across European markets where both companies operate. Though Nvidia’s acquisition price is reported at around $700 million, the deal was not automatically subject to EU regulatory review because it falls below the standard turnover threshold. However, after Italy’s competition authority flagged the case, the Commission agreed to take a closer look at the potential risks.
In its statement, the Commission highlighted that the merger “threatens to significantly affect competition in the markets where Nvidia and Run are active,” specifically pointing to an impact on the European Economic Area (EEA), which includes Italy. Nvidia may now be compelled to propose concessions to secure EU approval for the acquisition.
Related: Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuit in Strategic Filing Move by Xockets Inc.
Nvidia, known for its advanced processors that are essential for AI applications, has seen its market value and revenue surge over the past year. The company’s chips are widely used to support AI models such as ChatGPT, cementing its role as a leader in the AI hardware space. According to Tech Crunch, Nvidia announced its intention to acquire Run in April, marking its ongoing expansion into AI solutions. Run’s software enables developers to manage AI resources more efficiently, which is crucial for scaling AI infrastructure as the demand for AI technologies grows.
This latest antitrust scrutiny is part of a broader trend. Both EU and U.S. regulators have ramped up their examinations of mergers and acquisitions in the tech sector, scrutinizing deals with potentially far-reaching impacts on competition. According to Reuters, this intensified regulatory oversight reflects mounting concerns about the influence of tech giants in rapidly evolving sectors, particularly AI.
Source: Reuters

A federal appeals court on Thursday temporarily put on hold a lower court ruling that had delivered a significant victory to government employees and consumer advocates opposing President Donald Trump’s efforts to curtail the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). According to Reuters, the decision maintains a temporary pause while the court considers an emergency request from the Justice Department to overturn the previous ruling entirely.
The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia stopped short of reversing any provisions set forth by U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in her March 28 ruling. Per Reuters, her decision had ordered the CFPB to reinstate dismissed employees, restore canceled contracts, and continue performing its legally mandated duties. However, the appellate judges left in place interim measures preventing the administration from taking further action against agency staff or halting essential operations.
Despite the temporary stay, the three-judge panel emphasized that the decision should not be interpreted as an indication of their final ruling. “The purpose of this administrative stay is to give the court sufficient opportunity to consider the emergency motion for stay pending appeal and should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits of that motion,” the order stated, according to Reuters.
Related: CFPB Allows Some Operations to Resume Amid Legal Challenge
The Justice Department formally notified the court on Saturday of its intent to challenge Judge Berman Jackson’s order, seeking to overturn her directive that prevented the administration from erasing agency data, terminating employees, or discontinuing active contracts. The Trump administration’s moves against the CFPB began in February when the president dismissed the agency’s director and granted officials from Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency extensive access to sensitive CFPB data systems. The actions resulted in widespread layoffs, contract cancellations, and office closures, prompting consumer protection groups and affected workers to file a lawsuit denouncing the changes as unlawful.
According to Reuters, agency leadership has since attempted to walk back some of these measures, a move Judge Berman Jackson described as likely “a charade for the court’s benefit.” While the appeals court’s temporary stay keeps aspects of the lower court’s ruling in place for now, the broader legal battle over the CFPB’s future remains unresolved.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Federal Appeals Court Temporarily Halts Ruling in Consumer Bureau Battle
Apr 3, 2025 by
CPI
Capital One-Discover $35 Billion Merger Moves Forward After DOJ Decision
Apr 3, 2025 by
CPI
RealPage Sues Berkeley Over Ban on Rental Pricing Software
Apr 3, 2025 by
CPI
Olivia Trusty’s FCC Nomination Set for Senate Hearing Next Week
Apr 3, 2025 by
CPI
Amazon Challenges France’s Book Delivery Fee at EU Court
Apr 3, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – China Edition: Year of the Snake
Apr 3, 2025 by
CPI
The Fair Competition Review and the Unified National Market in China
Apr 3, 2025 by
Sen La & Wei Han
Facing the Conundrums: China’s Antitrust Policy Amid Geopolitical Shifts
Apr 3, 2025 by
Da Shi
Concentrations in China in 2023 and 2024
Apr 3, 2025 by
John Yong Ren, Karen Mei & Martha Shu Wen
SAMR’s Evolving Role on the Geopolitical Chessboard
Apr 3, 2025 by
Andrew Foster, Danette Chan & Flora Xiao