Online Sellers Challenge Indian Antitrust Investigation Against Flipkart and Amazon
Three online sellers operating on Walmart-owned Flipkart have taken legal action against the Indian antitrust watchdog over an investigation that found they, along with Flipkart and rival Amazon, violated competition laws. According to court filings reviewed by Reuters, the sellers are seeking to overturn the findings of the investigation and halt further proceedings by the Competition Commission of India (CCI).
This legal move comes on the heels of an August report by the CCI, which concluded that Amazon, Flipkart, and certain associated sellers, including smartphone brands, breached local competition regulations. The investigation was prompted by complaints from brick-and-mortar retailers represented by the Confederation of All India Traders, who accused these eCommerce giants of providing unfair advantages to select online sellers.
In their filings with the High Court of Karnataka, the three Flipkart sellers—CIGFIL Retail, Wishery Online, and Xonique Ventures—argue that their involvement in the investigation was mishandled. They assert that while they were asked to submit data to assist the CCI, they were later named as defendants, which they contend violates due process rights. “The alleged investigation … is arbitrary, opaque, unfair,” the sellers claimed in their submissions.
Related: Flipkart Sellers Sue Indian Antitrust Watchdog Over Competition Law Violation Findings
The legal challenge from these sellers has the potential to further delay the ongoing investigation, which originally began in 2020. Flipkart, one of India’s leading eCommerce platforms, faces increased scrutiny as it competes with Amazon in a rapidly growing market.
As this situation develops, both Flipkart and the CCI have yet to respond to requests for comment from Reuters. The court will likely hear the sellers’ arguments next week, which could have significant implications for the future of online retail in India.
In a related development, a former Amazon seller recently filed a lawsuit against the CCI, securing an interim injunction that prevents the investigation from advancing. The seller’s court documents, also reviewed by Reuters, assert that they were not properly notified before being implicated in the case.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
CVS Health Explores Potential Breakup Amid Investor Pressure: Report
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
DirecTV Acquires Dish TV, Creating 20 Million-Subscriber Powerhouse
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea Fines Kakao Mobility $54.8 Million for Anti-Competitive Practices
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Google Offers Settlement in India’s Antitrust Case Regarding Smart TVs
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Attorney Challenges NCAA’s $2.78 Billion Settlement in Landmark Antitrust Cases
Oct 3, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh