Twenty years after the emergence of platform literature antitrust courts and authorities still face formidable challenges in deciphering platform business models. The latest two Google cases (Google Search, Google Android) highlight the schism between what firms consider an innovative business plan and what the law is ready to accept. Noting the schism, this article focuses on a number of points that European competition law needs to address to better reconcile business practice with antitrust legal analysis with the view to enable successful firms to operate without fear of punitive enforcement.
Featured News
Judge Allows Depositions of LinkedIn Leaders in Antitrust Case
Aug 5, 2026 by
CPI
AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Dismiss Merger Talk Speculation
Aug 5, 2026 by
CPI
Senator Presses Trump Antitrust Nominee Over FCC’s Role in Content Oversight
Aug 5, 2026 by
CPI
Australia’s Competition Watchdog Opens Mobile Network Inquiry
Aug 5, 2026 by
CPI
EU Accuses Temu of Obstructing Foreign Subsidies Inspection in Dublin
Aug 5, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Antitrust Compliance
Jul 20, 2026 by
CPI
Your Antitrust Compliance Program: A Strong Voice in Your Defense
Jul 20, 2026 by
Joe Murphy
Antitrust Compliance for the AI Pricing Era
Jul 20, 2026 by
Alejandra Uria & Andre Geverola
Race to Report: Antitrust Leniency in the Whistleblower Era
Jul 20, 2026 by
Brian R. Faerstein & Nicole H. Sprinzen
Antitrust-By-Design: Competition Compliance in Digital Markets
Jul 20, 2026 by
Marcos Drummond Malvar, Gabriela Costa Carvalho Forsman & Luciana Mendes