
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has raised concerns regarding Qube Holdings’ planned acquisition of the Melbourne International RoRo and Auto Terminal, citing potential threats to competition in the automotive delivery supply chain at the Port of Melbourne. According to Reuters, Qube, Australia’s largest integrated terminal and freight logistics provider, announced the A$332.5 million ($220.61 million) deal in May 2024. The move would strengthen Qube’s position in the market, but the ACCC warns it may also limit competition in downstream services.
“If this transaction goes ahead, Qube would be operating the terminal while also being in active competition with other automotive stevedores or pre-delivery inspection (PDI) service providers,” ACCC commissioner Philip Williams stated, per Reuters. The regulator expressed concerns that Qube could gain an unfair advantage by controlling access to the terminal, potentially raising costs for competitors or reducing the quality of services offered at the port.
Read more: Australia’s Car Industry Presses ACCC to Focus on Electric Vehicles
In addition to fears over price hikes and restricted access, the ACCC also pointed out the risk of Qube obtaining commercially sensitive information from rivals, which could further distort market competition. The watchdog emphasized that such a deal could undermine fair competition in one of Australia’s critical automotive supply chain hubs.
Qube, however, defended the acquisition. In a statement to the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), the company highlighted its previous experience operating the Melbourne RoRo terminal through its subsidiary, Australian Amalgamated Terminals (AAT). The unit managed the terminal from 2002 until its lease expired in 2017. Qube assured that AAT operates its facilities under ACCC oversight and maintains a solid track record of compliance.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
CFPB Allows Some Operations to Resume Amid Legal Challenge
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
NASCAR Accuses Michael Jordan’s Race Team of Illegal Cartel in Legal Battle
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare Providers Sue BCBS Insurers Over Alleged Collusion
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Indian Distributors File Antitrust Case Against Quick-Delivery Giants
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
EU Lawmakers Send Letter Rejecting Claims of Bias in Digital Rules
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li