A group of Republican state attorneys general have written to insurers of the Net-Zero Insurance Alliance, expressing doubts about the legality of their pledge to work with other insurers and asset owners to promote a climate agenda.
The insurers being targeted are members of both NZIA and NZAOA.
According to AG’s letter, “The push to force insurance companies and their clients to rapidly reduce their emissions has led not only to increased insurance costs, but also to high gas prices and higher costs for products and services across the board, resulting in record-breaking inflation and financial hardships for the residents of our states.”
The letter continues, “In January 2023, the NZIA released its first “Target-Setting Protocol,” which explains your responsibilities as a member.
“While this protocol insists that it is ‘nonbinding’ and that you are ‘free’ to meet the protocol’s requirements ‘independently and unilaterally,’ it goes on to instruct that NZIA members must follow its directions on a ‘comply-or-explain basis.’
“Likewise, the plain language of the document ultimately requires you to take several, concrete and coordinated actions to alter your business.
“Specifically, the NZIA protocol requires you to adopt one of the NZIA’s defined climate targets by this summer and requires you to commit to three of them by next summer.
“These targets are anything but aspirational—they require you to take specific courses of action over the next two decades.”
As an example, the letter suggests that “Meeting NZIA’s ’emissions reduction target’ means choosing either an overarching insurance-associated emissions reduction target of 34-60% by 2030 or targeting emissions on a sector-by-sector basis in line with a net-zero pathway for that sector.”
Featured News
Google to Challenge Antitrust Ruling; CEO Sundar Pichai Signals Prolonged Legal Battle
Oct 14, 2024 by
CPI
FIFA Faces EU Antitrust Scrutiny Over Expanded Football Calendar
Oct 14, 2024 by
CPI
WhatsApp Faces Potential Antitrust Penalties in India Over Privacy Policy Update
Oct 14, 2024 by
CPI
Croatian Supermarket Chain Tommy Cleared to Acquire Brodokomerc Nova
Oct 13, 2024 by
CPI
X and Unilever Settle Antitrust Dispute, Continuing Partnership
Oct 13, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh