The bid for Microsoft to buy Activision-Blizzard continues to devolve as Sony accuses its biggest competitor of obvious harassment. The accusation comes on the heels of the U.K.‘s competition regulator provisionally concluding that the deal would harm gamers and competition in the gaming market.
The accusations were made by Sony after Microsoft filed a motion in court to make the company hand over performance reviews for its leadership. Sony fought the motion, saying, “Even in employment cases courts require a specific showing of relevance before requiring production of personnel files.” It went on to say, “This is not an employment case,” and that it was “obvious harassment.”
Related: Microsoft Says Sony Is Misleading European Commissioners
Presiding Judge D. Michael Chappell ruled in agreement with Sony, stating, “SIE has demonstrated good cause for the requested relief,” according to a report by Kotaku.Activision-Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick has been very outspoken in recent days concerning the controversy surrounding the deal with Microsoft. Kotick made the remark ahead of the CMA’s provisional finding that if the regulators blocked the deal it would make the U.K. look like “Death Valley,” instead of a Silicon Valley. The CEO also remarked in a recent interview that Sony had not only stopped talking to Microsoft, but that it had also cut the lines of communication with Activision-Blizzard as well.
Kotick added, “I think this is all Sony just trying to sabotage the transaction. The whole idea that we are not going to support a PlayStation or that Microsoft would not support the PlayStation, it is absurd.”
Featured News
Former DOJ Antitrust Chief Megan Lewis Joins McGuireWoods as Partner
Oct 3, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Tech Rivals Push for EU Crackdown on Microsoft Edge Dominance
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Pork Industry Faces Legal Challenges as Antitrust Lawsuits Against Seaboard Foods Dismissed
Oct 2, 2024 by
CPI
CMA Strengthens Investigation with Advisory Panel of Veterinary Experts
Oct 2, 2024 by
CPI
US Merchants Sue Visa, Alleging Unfair Dominance in Debit Card Market
Oct 2, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh