A PYMNTS Company

Supreme Court to Hear CCI Petition on Amazon, Flipkart Antitrust Cases

By  |  December 8, 2024

The Supreme Court is preparing to hear a petition filed by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to consolidate multiple cases related to its 2019 antitrust investigation against e-commerce giants Amazon and Flipkart. The CCI argues that conflicting rulings from different high courts could undermine the integrity of the investigation, prompting the need for a unified judicial forum, according to CNBC TV18.

The CCI’s antitrust probe centers on allegations of unfair trade practices by the two companies, including preferential treatment of certain sellers, deep discounting, and promoting exclusive arrangements. These actions are claimed to violate Indian competition laws and harm smaller businesses trying to compete in the digital marketplace.

Read more: India Raids Amazon, Flipkart Seller Offices in Foreign Investment Probe

The investigation was sparked by complaints from the Delhi Vyapar Mahasangh (DVM), a group representing small traders. The DVM accused Amazon and Flipkart of practices that stifle competition, including providing special privileges to preferred sellers. Among these allegations are claims that Amazon’s Cloudtail and Appario, and Flipkart’s Omnitech Retail, benefit from reduced platform fees and greater visibility. This preferential treatment allegedly enables these sellers to offer discounts that smaller sellers cannot match.

Additionally, the e-commerce platforms have faced criticism for promoting their own private label products through these preferred sellers, disadvantaging independent brands. The CCI probe also highlighted exclusive deals with manufacturers, which restrict consumer choice and limit competition in the market.

The CCI has expressed concerns that fragmented rulings from various high courts could hinder its ability to address the overarching competition issues posed by the eCommerce giants. By seeking consolidation of the cases in the Supreme Court, the regulator aims to streamline legal proceedings and ensure a consistent approach to the investigation.

Source: CNBC TV18

Federal Appeals Court Temporarily Halts Ruling in Consumer Bureau Battle Federal Appeals Court Temporarily Halts Ruling in CFPB Battle

Federal Appeals Court Temporarily Halts Ruling in Consumer Bureau Battle

By  |  April 3, 2025

A federal appeals court on Thursday temporarily put on hold a lower court ruling that had delivered a significant victory to government employees and consumer advocates opposing President Donald Trump’s efforts to curtail the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). According to Reuters, the decision maintains a temporary pause while the court considers an emergency request from the Justice Department to overturn the previous ruling entirely.

The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia stopped short of reversing any provisions set forth by U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in her March 28 ruling. Per Reuters, her decision had ordered the CFPB to reinstate dismissed employees, restore canceled contracts, and continue performing its legally mandated duties. However, the appellate judges left in place interim measures preventing the administration from taking further action against agency staff or halting essential operations.

Despite the temporary stay, the three-judge panel emphasized that the decision should not be interpreted as an indication of their final ruling. “The purpose of this administrative stay is to give the court sufficient opportunity to consider the emergency motion for stay pending appeal and should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits of that motion,” the order stated, according to Reuters.

Related: CFPB Allows Some Operations to Resume Amid Legal Challenge

The Justice Department formally notified the court on Saturday of its intent to challenge Judge Berman Jackson’s order, seeking to overturn her directive that prevented the administration from erasing agency data, terminating employees, or discontinuing active contracts. The Trump administration’s moves against the CFPB began in February when the president dismissed the agency’s director and granted officials from Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency extensive access to sensitive CFPB data systems. The actions resulted in widespread layoffs, contract cancellations, and office closures, prompting consumer protection groups and affected workers to file a lawsuit denouncing the changes as unlawful.

According to Reuters, agency leadership has since attempted to walk back some of these measures, a move Judge Berman Jackson described as likely “a charade for the court’s benefit.” While the appeals court’s temporary stay keeps aspects of the lower court’s ruling in place for now, the broader legal battle over the CFPB’s future remains unresolved.

Source: Reuters