Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, the world’s leading manufacturer of generic drugs, is expected to face a significant antitrust fine from the EU in the coming weeks.
The fine stems from allegations that the Israeli pharmaceutical giant engaged in anti-competitive behavior related to its popular multiple sclerosis medication, Copaxone. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation revealed that Teva is accused of disparaging rival products to maintain Copaxone’s market dominance.
The European Commission’s investigation, which began with dawn raids in 2019 and led to formal proceedings in 2021, centers on claims that Teva misused the patent system. The Commission contends that Teva’s actions were designed to artificially prolong Copaxone’s patent protection and prevent competition. This enforcement action reflects the EU’s broader concerns about practices that might hinder innovation in the pharmaceutical sector, especially in a landscape constrained by tight healthcare budgets.
Related: FTC Intervenes in Teva’s Inhaler Litigation Against Amneal Amid Patent Crackdown
Bloomberg reports that the European Commission has not commented on the impending fine, and Teva has not yet responded to requests for a statement. The Commission’s rigorous stance underscores the EU’s commitment to addressing anti-competitive practices that could impact market dynamics and drug affordability.
In a related development, Teva and its subsidiary Cephalon faced a fine of 60.5 million euros ($66.7 million) in 2020 for engaging in pay-for-delay schemes, where they agreed to delay the release of a cheaper generic version of Cephalon’s sleep disorder medication. This fine was part of a broader EU crackdown on such practices between brand-name drugmakers and their generic counterparts.
Source: Bloomberg
Featured News
Veteran Lawyers Launch Boutique Antitrust Firm in NY and DC
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU’s Top Court Upholds Antitrust Veto on Thyssenkrupp-Tata Steel Deal
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil’s Court Delays X’s Return Over Fine Payment Dispute
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Tencent and Guillemot Family Consider Potential Buyout of Ubisoft
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Second Price-Fixing Case Against Hotel-Casinos Dismissed by Federal Judge
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh