The Roberts Court and the Chicago School of Antitrust: The 2006 Term and Beyond
Joshua Wright, Nov 05, 2007
The U.S. Supreme Court issued four antitrust decisions this Term (the most it has issued since the 1989-1990 Term) and seven cases over the past two years. The antitrust activity level of the Roberts Court thus far has exceeded the single case average of the Court prior to the 2003-2004 Term by a significant margin. What can be said of the Roberts Court´s antitrust jurisprudence? This article examines the quartet of Supreme Court decisions issued during the 2006-2007 Term in an attempt to identify and characterize the antitrust philosophy of the Roberts Court. I argue that the Roberts Court decisions embrace the Chicago School of antitrust analysis and predict that the antitrust jurisprudence of this Court will increasingly reflect this influence.
Featured News
California to Implement Single Opt-Out System to Remove Personal Data From Data Brokers
Nov 14, 2025 by
CPI
Internal Meta Documents Spotlight Regulatory Void Around Fraudulent Social Media Ads
Nov 14, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Opens Antitrust Probe Into Leading Proxy Advisory Firms
Nov 13, 2025 by
CPI
Government Has Re-Opened, But Things Are Not Yet Back to Normal
Nov 13, 2025 by
CPI
Lina Khan Reviews NYC Executive Authority Ahead of Mamdani Administration
Nov 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Entertainment & Culture
Nov 13, 2025 by
CPI
Non-Playable Character: Competition Law Enforcement in the Video Game Market
Nov 13, 2025 by
Robin S. Crauthers
Gerrymandering Sports Entertainment Product Markets
Nov 13, 2025 by
Jodi Balsam
Redistribution via Competition Policy: A Case Study of Creative Industries
Nov 13, 2025 by
Friso Bostoen
Sports Governing Bodies vs. Antitrust 0 – 4? Sport and Competition Economics Comments on the Recent Judgements of the European Court of Justice
Nov 13, 2025 by
Oliver Budzinski