By: David Carlisle (Elliptic)
The regulatory landscape for stablecoins in the United States remains highly uncertain and fluid. While jurisdictions such as the EU, Hong Kong, and Singapore have started to implement comprehensive regulatory frameworks to oversee stablecoin issuers, the U.S. has yet to establish clear federal guidelines. This has been marked by legislative inaction and a heavy-handed enforcement approach, leaving the market without much-needed clarity on future regulations. At the state level, there has been some progress, with certain regulators providing more direction, but the lack of coordination between states has resulted in a fragmented regulatory environment.
This creates significant challenges for stablecoin issuers looking to innovate and grow within the U.S. Without clear guidance on regulatory expectations and the looming uncertainty of potential future rules, stablecoin issuers face a difficult road ahead. At the same time, U.S. policymakers have expressed increasing concerns about stablecoins’ potential involvement in financial crimes, including sanctions evasion, and have indicated a willingness to take action to mitigate these risks.
In such a complex and uncertain environment, it can be extremely difficult for stablecoin issuers to gain the trust of regulatory authorities necessary for continued innovation. In this blog, we provide an overview of the evolving regulatory and policy landscape for stablecoin issuance in the U.S. and explain how Elliptic’s Ecosystem Monitoring capabilities can help issuers build trust and ensure compliance with regulatory expectations…
Featured News
CVS Health Explores Potential Breakup Amid Investor Pressure: Report
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
DirecTV Acquires Dish TV, Creating 20 Million-Subscriber Powerhouse
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea Fines Kakao Mobility $54.8 Million for Anti-Competitive Practices
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Google Offers Settlement in India’s Antitrust Case Regarding Smart TVs
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Attorney Challenges NCAA’s $2.78 Billion Settlement in Landmark Antitrust Cases
Oct 3, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh