TikTok, the Chinese online social media giant, has taken a stand against a supervisory fee imposed by EU regulators, marking the second company to challenge the levy following Meta Platforms’ lead. Under the Digital Services Act (DSA), TikTok, along with 19 other very large online platforms, is mandated to pay an annual charge to cover the costs of EU regulators’ oversight of compliance with new EU rules.
The fee, amounting to 0.05% of TikTok’s annual worldwide net income, has sparked contention. A TikTok spokesperson voiced their disagreement, citing concerns over the methodology used for calculating the fee. The spokesperson highlighted the use of purportedly flawed third-party estimates of monthly active user numbers as a basis for determining the total amount.
In response, the European Commission has stood firm, asserting the solidity of its decision and methodology. A spokesperson for the EU executive emphasized the commission’s commitment to defending its position in court.
Read more: TikTok Updates Data Usage Regulations To Fit EU Laws
The deadline for payment of the fees was December 31, 2023, with assurances from the European Commission that all the concerned Very Large Online Platforms/Search Engines honored their commitments. Notably, companies such as Amazon and Elon Musk’s X, which incurred losses in 2022, are exempt from paying the 2023 fee. However, Amazon, having returned to profitability last year, will be obligated to pay for the current year.
This dispute underscores the evolving landscape of regulation in the digital sphere and the ongoing tensions between tech giants and regulatory bodies. As TikTok and Meta challenge the supervisory fee, the outcome of this legal battle will likely have significant implications for the relationship between online platforms and EU regulators.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI