China’s Supreme People’s Court has issued a judgment that will make it easier for plaintiffs to show abuse of dominance or monopolization. The court reduced the plaintiff’s burden of proof in a civil lawsuit against companies or public utilities. The burden has shifted, so now it is the other side that must show that they did not abuse their dominant market position, for dominance cases, or that they did not restrict competition or exclude competitors, for monopolization cases.
Featured News
LinkedIn Seeks to Block Depositions of Senior Leaders in Ongoing Antitrust Class Action
Aug 3, 2026 by
CPI
White House Finalizes Voluntary AI Cybersecurity Testing Framework
Aug 3, 2026 by
CPI
Apple Faces Russian Antitrust Investigation Tied to Domestic App Policy
Aug 3, 2026 by
CPI
Seoul Investigates Alleged Housing Price Collusion Through KakaoTalk Group
Aug 3, 2026 by
CPI
Axinn Hires Former DOJ, FTC Lawyers to Expand Antitrust Practice
Aug 3, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Antitrust Compliance
Jul 20, 2026 by
CPI
Your Antitrust Compliance Program: A Strong Voice in Your Defense
Jul 20, 2026 by
Joe Murphy
Antitrust Compliance for the AI Pricing Era
Jul 20, 2026 by
Alejandra Uria & Andre Geverola
Race to Report: Antitrust Leniency in the Whistleblower Era
Jul 20, 2026 by
Brian R. Faerstein & Nicole H. Sprinzen
Antitrust-By-Design: Competition Compliance in Digital Markets
Jul 20, 2026 by
Marcos Drummond Malvar, Gabriela Costa Carvalho Forsman & Luciana Mendes