UK Competition Regulator Requires Lindab to Divest Sites Following Antitrust Probe

Swedish ventilation company Lindab (LIAB.ST) has been ordered to sell two of its sites in the U.K. following concerns raised by the country’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). The regulator found that Lindab’s acquisition of domestic competitor HAS-Vent could lead to higher prices and a reduction in competition within the market for ventilation systems.
According to Reuters, the CMA’s in-depth investigation revealed a “substantial lessening of competition” in the supply of circular ducts and fittings, particularly in areas around Nottingham and Stoke-on-Trent. As a result, Lindab must divest all four of its sites in these regions and propose potential buyers for the regulator’s approval. This move is intended to safeguard competition in local markets, preventing price increases that could negatively affect customers.
Read more: UK Prime Minister Pressures CMA for Growth-Focused Antitrust Regulations
The acquisition in question, announced in October of the previous year, saw Lindab bolster its U.K. sales and production capacity through the purchase of Birmingham-based HAS-Vent. Lindab currently operates through its U.K. subsidiaries, Lindab U.K. and Ductmann, which together manage 24 branches. Both companies are involved in the manufacturing and distribution of ventilation products.
Per Reuters, last month the CMA had hinted that the sale of overlapping Lindab and HAS-Vent branches in specific local areas would be a suitable solution. This divestiture aims to restore competitive conditions, ensuring that customers in the Nottingham and Stoke-on-Trent regions are not subject to inflated prices due to diminished market competition.
This decision underscores the regulator’s ongoing efforts to ensure that mergers and acquisitions do not undermine fair competition, particularly in industries where consolidation could have a direct impact on pricing and product availability.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
CFPB Allows Some Operations to Resume Amid Legal Challenge
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
NASCAR Accuses Michael Jordan’s Race Team of Illegal Cartel in Legal Battle
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare Providers Sue BCBS Insurers Over Alleged Collusion
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Indian Distributors File Antitrust Case Against Quick-Delivery Giants
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
EU Lawmakers Send Letter Rejecting Claims of Bias in Digital Rules
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li