The UK financial markets regulator has finalised rules strengthening the duty of asset managers to act in the best interests of investors in their funds.
The rules are the first that the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has adopted following its landmark asset management market study. The study, published last year, found weak price competition among asset managers and led it to refer the investment consultant sector for a competition investigation.
The regulator dropped the term “value for money” from the rules requiring fund managers to justify to investors the charges they take from funds, following a consultation.
However, requirements published on April 5 today stated that fund charges should be assessed annually in the context of the overall value delivered.
The supervisor will also make it “easier for firms to switch investors to cheaper versions of the same fund,” Andrew Strange, a director at PricewaterhouseCoopers, said in an email. It’s an example “of the regulator helping firms deliver value,” he said.
The supervisor estimated in 2016 that about £109 billion (US$153 billion) was tied up in active funds that closely mirror market performance but charge higher fees than passive products. Some firms charged fees like active managers but operated like lower-cost passive funds, the FCA said last month. The firms paid £34 million (US$47.6 million) in compensation to investors in the funds.
Full Content: Bloomberg
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
DoorDash, Grubhub, and Uber Eats Settle With NYC Over Cap Fees
Apr 30, 2025 by
CPI
Pork Giants Push to Overturn Price-Fixing Suit Citing Clerk’s Alleged Conflicts
Apr 30, 2025 by
CPI
Novartis to Acquire Regulus Therapeutics in $1.7 Billion Deal
Apr 30, 2025 by
CPI
India’s Competition Commission Clears J&K Bank in Antitrust Case
Apr 30, 2025 by
CPI
Spain’s Antitrust Watchdog Clears BBVA’s Sabadell Bid With Conditions
Apr 30, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece