The UK is facing pushback by lawmakers in the US and lobbyists who contend a new tax on some of the world’s biggest internet companies would create what is seen as a dangerous precedent.
According to the Financial Times, which cited Tom Donohue, president of the US Chamber of Commerce — lobbyists and lawmakers, Donohue and others think the tax would target big American technology companies unfairly. In a letter to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, Donohue said, “the American business community supports international dialogue on ways to modernize the international taxation system to adapt to changes in the global economy. Unilateral European actions will erode trust and lessen the prospects for the international agreement; indeed, we now see governments outside of Europe considering similar actions.” Meanwhile, a Republican Senate aide told the Financial Times that senators have urged the EU to get rid of a similar plan, arguing it will create a new transatlantic trade barrier and target US companies.
Earlier this week the UK announced it was aiming to lodge a 2% tax on the UK-generated revenues of search engines, social media companies, and online marketplaces if revenue on a global basis is more than £500 million (US$638.5 million) a year and the company is profitable. The UK is among several countries that are looking at overhauling their tax codes to capture more revenue from the likes of Facebook, Amazon, and Google.
Josh Kallmer, head of policy at the Information Technology Industry Council — which counts Google, Apple, and eBay as members — argued the tax idea misunderstands how business is conducted. “Virtually any company that does business across borders is digital to significant degree,” he said in the report, noting it could result in the tax applying to companies that aren’t traditionally viewed as tech companies. The report noted its not clear what financial impact the UK tax would have on the tech companies, but it did say the tax will apply to 30 if not more tech companies, generating £400 million (US$510.7 million) a year by 2023. That would imply that on average, each affected company will pay an additional (US$16.6 million), noted the report. For US companies it could be a lot higher given the size of their revenue.
Full Content: PYMNTS
Featured News
Meta Begins Defense After FTC Concludes Case in Landmark Antitrust Trial
May 15, 2025 by
CPI
UK Data Bill Still No Closer to Passage As Parliamentary ‘Ping-Pong’ Drags On
May 15, 2025 by
CPI
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Awarded $271.2M in Damages Against Amgen
May 15, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Chair Proposes 15% Staff Reduction Amid Budget Constraints
May 15, 2025 by
CPI
UK Urges Antitrust Watchdog to Prioritize Growth and Clarity in Business Regulation
May 15, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Healthcare Antitrust
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare & Antitrust: What to Expect in the New Trump Administration
May 14, 2025 by
Nana Wilberforce, John W O'Toole & Sarah Pugh
Patent Gaming and Disparagement: Commission Fines Teva For Improperly Protecting Its Blockbuster Medicine
May 14, 2025 by
Blaž Višnar, Boris Andrejaš, Apostolos Baltzopoulos, Rieke Kaup, Laura Nistor & Gianluca Vassallo
Strategic Alliances in the Pharma Sector: An EU Competition Law Perspective
May 14, 2025 by
Christian Ritz & Benedikt Weiss
Monopsony Power in the Hospital Labor Market
May 14, 2025 by
Kevin E. Pflum & Christian Salas