A PYMNTS Company

US: Attorneys argue Aetna-Humana deal violates antitrust law at trial

By  |  December 5, 2016

Attorneys for the US Justice Department argued before a federal court judge on Monday that health insurer Aetna’splanned acquisition of Humana violated antitrust law for its Medicare and Obamacare exchange businesses, kicking off a trial expected to last weeks.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    The Justice Department filed a lawsuit in July asking the court to stop Aetna’s $34 billion deal for Humana, arguing that it would lead to higher prices for people in Medicare and the individual insurance program created under the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare).

    Aetna said in return on Monday that Medicare Advantage competes with the government’s traditional Medicare program for elderly or disabled patients and that it plans to stay out of the exchanges in the near future.

    Both those programs, as well as antitrust enforcement, could be facing changes under President-elect Donald Trump’s administration.

    Justice Department lawyer Craig Conrath told Judge John Bates of the US District Court for the District of Columbia that traditional government-managed Medicare does not compete with Medicare Advantage, which is managed by insurance companies.

    Full Content: Reuters

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.