AT&T’s CEO faced a grilling from senators over competition concerns around its $85.4 billion bid to buy Time Warner Entertainment.
Randall Stephenson, chairman and CEO, appeared alongside Time Warner chief Jeff Bewkes to answer questions put forward by the Senate antitrust commission over the proposed takeover, one of the biggest in telecoms history.
The deal was announced in October but was immediately met with opposition. President-elect Donald Trump promised to block the takeover, although reports claim he has softened his stance since winning the election last month.
Senator Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat, challenged the two CEOs to address Trump’s threat to block the deal, with Bewkes and Stephenson both pledging it would not influence the coverage of news outlets such as CNN, which is owned by Time Warner.
Senator Amy Klobuchar, also a Democrat, likened the proposed takeover to a “tired movie franchise”, adding: “We can predict the ending before it begins. The promise of thriving competition collapses, replaced by dominant firms with monopoly power.”
Senators expressed concerns around the merged company’s ability to use its power to dictate rates and terms to other networks, by concentrating too much power into one company.
In defending the deal, Stephenson said the acquisition could act as a challenge to cable companies, while also promoting the roll -out of faster services.
“What this merger is not about is consolidation either in media or telecom,” Stephenson said.
“Our intent is to disrupt the existing pay-TV model. We want to get the most content to the most people at the lowest cost. And we want consumers to pay for their content once and then watch it anywhere at any time. Every episode, every season on whatever device they choose.”
Congress will not rule on the deal, as it will be reviewed by the Justice Department and possibly the Federal Communications Commission. Trump’s election means the FCC is facing a major overhaul, but whether this will benefit AT&T’s merger plans or harm them remains to be seen.
Full Content: Capacity Media
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Veteran Lawyers Launch Boutique Antitrust Firm in NY and DC
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU’s Top Court Upholds Antitrust Veto on Thyssenkrupp-Tata Steel Deal
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil’s Court Delays X’s Return Over Fine Payment Dispute
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Tencent and Guillemot Family Consider Potential Buyout of Ubisoft
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Second Price-Fixing Case Against Hotel-Casinos Dismissed by Federal Judge
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh