The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has reversed a district judge’s decision that threw out an antitrust lawsuit against Duke Energy Corp. The lawsuit accuses Cinergy–which was bought by Duke in 2006–of paying kickbacks to Cincinnati-area companies to win their support for an electricty rate increase in 2004.
The district judge had ruled that it did not have jurisdiction over the state-law claims; instead, jurisdiction rested exclusively with the Public Utilities Commission, which had approved Duke’s rates.
The three-judge panel unanimously reinstated the lawsuit, which is brought on behalf of Ohio businesses and consumers who saw their electricity bills go up after the rate hike.
Full content: Associated Press via Businessweek
Related content: Industry Restructuring, Mergers, and Efficiency: Evidence from Electric Power
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Uruguayan Antitrust Scrutiny Puts Major Meatpacking Deal Between Marfrig and Minerva on Hold
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Alaska Airlines Seeks Dismissal of Consumer Lawsuit Over $1.9 Billion Hawaiian Airlines Buy
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Idaho Attorney General Orders Split of Kootenai Health and Syringa Hospital
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Court Rejects T-Mobile’s Appeal Bid in Antitrust Case Over Sprint Merger
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Google Requests Judge, Not Jury, to Decide on Antitrust Case
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Mapping Antitrust onto Digital Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystems and Competition Law: A Law and Political Economy Approach
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystem Theories of Harm: What is Beyond the Buzzword?
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Open Ecosystems: Benefits, Challenges, and Implications for Antitrust
May 9, 2024 by
CPI