U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff in Manhattan said that Uber Technologies Inc. can’t require a Connecticut customer, Spencer Meyer, who accused the company of price-fixing to resolve the fight in arbitration. Rakoff denied Uber’s request to throw out the antitrust lawsuit over the company’s practice of raising prices during periods of high demand and have the matter sent to an arbitrator.
Featured News
Paramount Seeks Judge’s Recusal in State Antitrust Fight Over Warner Bros. Discovery Deal
Jul 15, 2026 by
CPI
FCC Chair Suggests CNN Ownership Changes Could Be Ahead
Jul 15, 2026 by
CPI
Italy Investigates Alleged Abuse of Market Power in Superyacht Berthing Sector
Jul 15, 2026 by
CPI
Goodwin Strengthens Antitrust Practice With Strategic San Francisco Hire
Jul 15, 2026 by
CPI
Russia Opens Antitrust Case Against Rusal Over Domestic Aluminum Prices
Jul 15, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Due Process
Jul 7, 2026 by
CPI
The Hart‑Scott‑Rodino Act at Fifty: Procedure, Thresholds, Serial Acquisitions, and Industry Dynamics
Jul 7, 2026 by
Ginger Zhe Jin, Mario Leccese, Daniel Sokol, Liad Wagman & Mengyi Zhong
Due Process In Competition Cases: Reflections As Of 2026
Jul 7, 2026 by
Ian Forrester & Pablo Trevisan
When Referees Become Reformers: Due Process and Constitutional Considerations in Competition Market Investigations
Jul 7, 2026 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Procedural Fairness in Antitrust Enforcement: A Comparative Analysis
Jul 7, 2026 by
J. Mark Gidley & Daniel Sokol