A PYMNTS Company

US: FTC gets mixed ruling from administrative judge in dental case

By  |  October 17, 2019
FTC Front

An administrative law judge at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has ruled that Benco Dental Supply and Patterson Companies violated antitrust law by refusing to compete for the business of buying groups, but dismissed a complaint against a third company, Henry Schein, Reuters reported. 

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    The FTC had accused the three companies, the three largest US full-service distributors of dental supplies ranging from chairs to cement to gloves, of violating antitrust law in February 2018. 

    According to Reuters, Judge Michael Chappell said in a decision dated Tuesday, October 15, that the FTC “has shown that there was an agreement between Benco and Patterson to refuse to offer discounted prices or otherwise negotiate with buying groups. As held below, that agreement unreasonably restrained trade in the full-service dental distribution market in the United States.”

    Henry Schein Chief Executive Stanley Bergman welcomed the judge’s decision to drop them from the case, saying, “Henry Schein has always been committed to doing business in an ethical manner wherever we operate.” 

    A spokesperson for Benco said it was considering an appeal, adding that “neither the facts nor the law support the FTC claim against Benco… We have always believed that the FTC claims against Benco were without merit.”

    Full Content: Reuters

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.