HP was awarded US$439 million in damages against Quanta after a federal judge tripled a jury’s 2019 award for damages caused by a widespread scheme to inflate the price of optical disk drives.
In October, a Houston jury ordered Quanta to pay HP US$176 million in damages. US District Judge David Hittner said Friday, January 3, that Quanta hadn’t shown any reason why the jury’s findings should be set aside. He tripled the damages award, as authorized under antitrust law, to US$528 million before deducting the US$89 million in settlements paid by the other companies HP accused of participating in the price-fixing scheme.
Other disk-drive makers like Hitachi-LG, Sony, and Panasonic settled with HP over the past decade. Only Taiwan-based Quanta chose to go to trial.
Andrew Lusby, an attorney for Quanta, said Friday the company was not commenting at this time on the tripled damages.
The company had argued to Hittner that tripling damages would violate constitutional prohibitions on excessive punitive damages. But the judge rejected that argument, pointing out that antitrust law allows for tripling awards as compensatory rather than punitive damages.
“HP hopes this judgment sends a powerful message to suppliers all over the world that there are significant consequences when you violate US antitrust laws,” Alex B. Roberts, HP’s lawyer, said in an email after Hittner ruled
Full Content: Bloomberg
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
EU Regulators Probe SES-Intelsat Deal, Seek Insight on Starlink’s Competitive Threat
May 12, 2025 by
CPI
Trump Removes Copyright and Library of Congress Leaders After AI Policy Rift
May 12, 2025 by
CPI
Delta, Korean Air Buy Into WestJet in Major Cross-Border Deal
May 12, 2025 by
CPI
Trump Targets Big Pharma With Tough New Drug Pricing Rules
May 12, 2025 by
CPI
Geradin Partners Expands London Team with New Partner Hire
May 12, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece