
A U.S. federal judge has ruled that four major fragrance manufacturers must face lawsuits alleging they conspired to inflate the prices of key ingredients used in cosmetics, cleaning supplies, and other household products. According to a decision by U.S. District Judge William Martini in New Jersey, Switzerland-based Givaudan and Firmenich (now merged with DSM Group), U.S.-based International Flavors & Fragrances, and Germany’s Symrise failed to have the cases dismissed.
Per the ruling, the lawsuits stem from a broader antitrust investigation launched by European regulators in 2023, which scrutinized the practices of several major players in the fragrance industry. While Judge Martini dismissed some state-based claims, he granted plaintiffs the opportunity to amend and refile those portions of the lawsuit within 30 days.
The legal battle involves multiple groups of plaintiffs, including consumers, direct purchasers who bought fragrance ingredients from the defendants, and indirect buyers who obtained products containing those ingredients from third-party sellers. According to the plaintiffs, the fragrance industry is highly concentrated, making it vulnerable to collusive and anti-competitive practices. They pointed to the industry’s $9.1 billion market size in 2022 as evidence of its economic significance.
Read more: UK’s Tesco Sues Norwegian Salmon Producers Over Alleged Price Fixing
The defendant companies sought to have the cases dismissed, arguing that the plaintiffs failed to present substantial evidence of price-fixing. In their defense, the fragrance makers claimed that the allegations were primarily based on reports of government inquiries rather than concrete proof of an unlawful agreement.
In response to the ongoing scrutiny, DSM-Firmenich stated on Monday that it is cooperating with the previously disclosed investigations by both U.S. and European competition authorities. However, the company, along with the other defendants, has denied any wrongdoing. Givaudan, Symrise, and International Flavors & Fragrances did not immediately provide comments on the ruling.
The European Commission confirmed in June 2024 that its investigation into potential antitrust violations within the fragrance industry remains active. Meanwhile, the legal proceedings in the U.S. continue under the case titles In re: Fragrance Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation, In re: Fragrance Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Litigation, and In re: Fragrance End-User Plaintiff Antitrust Litigation, all before the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.
Source: Fashion Network
Featured News
Atkore Faces Shareholder Lawsuit Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Mar 19, 2025 by
CPI
US Appeals Court Upholds Ruling Denying Copyright for AI-Generated Art
Mar 19, 2025 by
CPI
Morrison Foerster Expands European Antitrust Practice
Mar 19, 2025 by
CPI
HSBC in Advanced Talks to Sell German Fund Unit to BlackFin Capital Partners
Mar 19, 2025 by
CPI
EU’s Antitrust War on Big Tech Heats Up as US Trade Disputes Grow
Mar 19, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li