The US District Court judge hearing the US Justice Department’s case to block Aetna $34 billion purchase of Humana has set a trial date for Dec. 5, 2016, later than the companies had requested.
Aetna and Humana are fighting the US Department of Justice’s lawsuit asserting that combining the two companies will harm consumers and raise prices. The companies were seeking an earlier date for the trial to increase the possibility of closing the deal within their target timeframe.
Judge John Bates of the US District Court for the District of Columbia said during a hearing on Wednesday that the companies had failed to define any harm that would be caused by setting the date in December.
Full Content: Reuters
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
FTC v. Meta Trial Turns to Market Definition
Apr 28, 2025 by
CPI
Marriott to Acquire CitizenM for $355 Million, Expanding Urban Lifestyle Offerings
Apr 28, 2025 by
CPI
Thomson Reuters Urges Third Circuit to Block Ross Intelligence’s Copyright Appeal
Apr 28, 2025 by
CPI
Merck KGaA to Acquire SpringWorks for $3.9 Billion
Apr 28, 2025 by
CPI
Federal Judge Dismisses Mario Chalmers’ Antitrust Lawsuit Against NCAA Over NIL Rights
Apr 28, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece