iPic, a pioneering industry leader of award-winning night-out entertainment destinations that include luxury movie theaters and restaurants, today announced that it has secured an injunction from a Texascourt that prevents Regal Entertainment from continuing to engage in anticompetitive “clearances” as part of Regal’s efforts to prevent the licensing of first-run movies to iPic’s theater in Houston, Texas.
In a lawsuit filed in November 2015 in the 234th District Court in Harris County, Texas, iPic sought a temporary injunction order to halt unfair and anticompetitive business practices by Regal, the largest theater circuit in the nation. Regal has been using its dominant market position to prevent the licensing of first-run films to iPic® in Houston that would be played in the same market at the same time, an effort calculated to cripple the Houston iPic theater from competing.
In the two months since the new iPic Houston theater has been open, Regal has illegally and repeatedly coerced studios to exclude iPic’s theater from being able to show popular first-run films including “The Hateful 8,” “Ride Along 2,” and “The Revenant.” In addition the lawsuit recounts specific other examples around the country where Regal threatened boycotts of specific movie studios, and the first-run films they produce, if smaller boutique theaters were given licensing rights to such releases.
“iPic is extremely pleased that the Court ordered Regal to immediately stop its anticompetitive campaign,” Hamid Hashemi, President & CEO of iPic Entertainment said. “We’re thrilled to be able to play all pictures at our iPic theater in the River Oaks District. This is good for our guests, for the industry, and for iPic.”
Full content: The Hollywood Reporter
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
9th Circuit Revives Privacy Lawsuit Against Shopify Over Data Tracking
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
DOJ Warns Google Could Use AI Tools to Extend Search Monopoly As Antitrust Remedies Trial Begins
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Uber Faces Regulatory Heat as FTC Targets Subscription Practices
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Supreme Court Declines to Hear CSX Antitrust Case Against Norfolk Southern
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Proposed Antitrust Law Could Cost NY Billions, Says Business Council
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickinson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece