Legal Remedies For Patent Infringement: From General Principles To FRAND Obligations For Standard Essential Patents
Richard Epstein, David J. Kappos, Dec 20, 2013
At present, the traditional informal mechanisms for setting FRAND rates for SEPs have come under extensive attack by the Federal Trade Commission and elsewhere, from those who believe more limited damages and less frequent injunctions offer the best path to resolving disputes over Standard Essential Patents. In this article we take issue with those conclusions. We begin with an explanation of how a damage system for ordinary contract disputes does not typically rely on the three standard measures—expectation, reliance, restitution—for resolution, but uses liquidated damage to deal with the scenario where a defendant seeks to “out its own agreements. We argue that the techniques that work generally in contract law offer strong confirmation of the traditional rules of damages and injunctions now under wide assault…
Featured News
Saudi Arabia Reviews Uber’s $14.8 Billion Delivery Hero Takeover
Sep 24, 2026 by
CPI
Pope Leo Warns of AI Threats, Calls for Stronger Global Oversight
Sep 24, 2026 by
CPI
Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Settlement Faces Coalition Challenge
Sep 24, 2026 by
CPI
New York Grocery Plan Puts Predatory-Pricing Rules to the Test
Sep 24, 2026 by
CPI
Nvidia CEO Opposes Antitrust, Liability Carveouts for AI Firms
Sep 24, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – National Security
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
National Security in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement: Toward a More Disciplined Framework
Sep 22, 2026 by
Rod Rosenstein & Timothy Finley
The Department of War’s M&A Review Guidance: What Companies in the Defense Industry Need to Know
Sep 22, 2026 by
Eric Stocking & Paul Ney
National Security, Resilience and the Boundaries of Merger Control
Sep 22, 2026 by
Beatriz Marques
National Security and Competition: Building Resilient Telecommunications Networks
Sep 22, 2026 by
Roslyn Layton