The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette has gone to court in efforts to review sealed documents produced from a separate antitrust case concerning health insurers in Pennsylvania. According to reports, arguments were heard Thursday over whether the newspaper should be allowed to review the documents, which include motions and exhibits that are part of a case in which the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center is accusing health insurer Highmark of monopolizing the western region of the state. The newspaper’s lawyers have filed a motion claiming its request to review the documents follows legal precedents, further arguing that it is part of the public’s rights to judicial records to have the paper review the documents. Both the university and Highmark have requested that the documents remain sealed.
Full Content: Thomson Reuters
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI