The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette has gone to court in efforts to review sealed documents produced from a separate antitrust case concerning health insurers in Pennsylvania. According to reports, arguments were heard Thursday over whether the newspaper should be allowed to review the documents, which include motions and exhibits that are part of a case in which the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center is accusing health insurer Highmark of monopolizing the western region of the state. The newspaper’s lawyers have filed a motion claiming its request to review the documents follows legal precedents, further arguing that it is part of the public’s rights to judicial records to have the paper review the documents. Both the university and Highmark have requested that the documents remain sealed.
Featured News
Google May Be Required to Offer Search Alternatives in UK
Jun 24, 2025 by
CPI
Spain Puts Brakes on BBVA-Sabadell Merger, Deal Faces Uncertain Future
Jun 24, 2025 by
CPI
In Win For AI Companies, Court Finds AI Training Is Fair Use, But Only From Lawful Sources
Jun 24, 2025 by
CPI
Lawmakers Reintroduce Bipartisan Bill to Curb Big Tech’s App Store Power
Jun 24, 2025 by
CPI
Belgian Competition Authority Launches Inspections in Personal Care and Retail Sectors
Jun 24, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Theories of Harm
Jun 17, 2025 by
CPI
What Do We Mean by Harm to the Competitive Process?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Sean Sullivan
Is There a Better Approach to Vertical Merger Analysis?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Bob Majure & Andrew Sfekas
California’s Ill-Advised Turn Toward Europeanized Theories of Harm For Single-Firm Conduct
Jun 17, 2025 by
Geoffrey Manne, Dirk Auer & Brian Albrecht
EU Competition Policy in Support of Democracy and Sustainability: What Theories of Harm When Moving Away From the Predominance of the Consumer Welfare Paradigm?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Marios C. Iacovides