The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette has gone to court in efforts to review sealed documents produced from a separate antitrust case concerning health insurers in Pennsylvania. According to reports, arguments were heard Thursday over whether the newspaper should be allowed to review the documents, which include motions and exhibits that are part of a case in which the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center is accusing health insurer Highmark of monopolizing the western region of the state. The newspaper’s lawyers have filed a motion claiming its request to review the documents follows legal precedents, further arguing that it is part of the public’s rights to judicial records to have the paper review the documents. Both the university and Highmark have requested that the documents remain sealed.
Featured News
House Votes to Pass CLARITY Act After Drama Threatened to Derail Crypto Market Structure Bill
Jul 17, 2025 by
CPI
Zillow Rejects Compass’s Antitrust Claims Amid Listing Policy Dispute
Jul 17, 2025 by
CPI
DOJ Probes ServiceNow’s $2.85B AI Merger with Moveworks
Jul 17, 2025 by
CPI
Authors Can Sue Anthropic Over Alleged AI Book Piracy, Judge Rules
Jul 17, 2025 by
CPI
Charter, Cox Request FCC Green Light for $34.5B Merger
Jul 17, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Surveillance Pricing
Jul 14, 2025 by
CPI
Should We Fear Personalized Pricing?
Jul 14, 2025 by
John Yun
Data and Price Competition: The Special Role of Information About Rivals’ Prices
Jul 14, 2025 by
Zach Y. Brown & Alexander MacKay
Surveillance Pricing: A Cautionary Summary of Potential Harms and Solutions
Jul 14, 2025 by
Ginger Zhe Jin, Liad Wagman & Mengyi Zhong
The Rise of Surveillance Pricing
Jul 14, 2025 by
Rebecca Kirk Fair, Alvaro Ziadi & Juan Carvajal