The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette has gone to court in efforts to review sealed documents produced from a separate antitrust case concerning health insurers in Pennsylvania. According to reports, arguments were heard Thursday over whether the newspaper should be allowed to review the documents, which include motions and exhibits that are part of a case in which the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center is accusing health insurer Highmark of monopolizing the western region of the state. The newspaper’s lawyers have filed a motion claiming its request to review the documents follows legal precedents, further arguing that it is part of the public’s rights to judicial records to have the paper review the documents. Both the university and Highmark have requested that the documents remain sealed.
Featured News
Kimberly-Clark Seeks EU Antitrust Approval for Kenvue Takeover
Aug 26, 2026 by
CPI
UK Competition Watchdog Opens Formal Review of Brink’s $6.6 Billion NCR Atleos Acquisition
Aug 26, 2026 by
CPI
Trump Weighs Beef Deregulation Amid Meatpacking Antitrust Scrutiny
Aug 26, 2026 by
CPI
Meta Reaches $16.68 Billion Deal With US States Over Social-Media Risks
Aug 26, 2026 by
CPI
Teva Faces New Antitrust Scrutiny in Turkey Over Copaxone Patents
Aug 26, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – State Attorneys General
Aug 27, 2026 by
CPI
CPI Talks… with Jonathan Skrmetti, Attorney General of Tennessee
Aug 27, 2026 by
Jonathan Skrmetti
What the Live Nation Jury Instructions Tell Us About California’s Unfair Competition Law
Aug 27, 2026 by
Henry Hauser, Brent Nakamura, Ashley Kaplan, Brian Wang & Cari Jeffries
From Backroom Deals to Public Scrutiny: The Tunney Act’s Past, Present, and Future
Aug 27, 2026 by
Christina M. Black & Ashley A. Locke
Understanding the Fragility of Economic Concentration Through the Principles of Ecology
Aug 27, 2026 by
Alexandra Spring